„Sukob nadležnosti“ kod sukoba nadležnosti u upravnom postupku

A conflict of jurisdiction in administrative proceedings occurs when two authorities declare themselves competent (positive conflict) or not competent (negative conflict) to act in the same administrative matter (case). The regulations that determine the authorities responsible for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction contain certain ambiguities, which can be interpreted as overlapping jurisdiction for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction, on the one hand, and gaps in terms of jurisdiction for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction between certain categories of administrative entities, on the other hand. In this sense, the paper talks about the ‘conflict of jurisdiction’, in the first case ‘positive’, and in the second ‘negative’. We are not talking about real conflicts of jurisdiction, because they can arise only with respect to a specific administrative matter, but about vague norms that regulate or fail to adequately regulate jurisdiction for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction, which can lead to problems in determining the authority responsible for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pravo i privreda
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55836/pip_24303a
Primary Topic
Law, logistics, and international trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

„Sukob nadležnosti“ kod sukoba nadležnosti u upravnom postupku

Vuk Cucić
Pravo i privreda
Law, logistics, and international trade
article

„Sukob nadležnosti“ kod sukoba nadležnosti u upravnom postupku

Vuk Cucić
article en

Abstract

A conflict of jurisdiction in administrative proceedings occurs when two authorities declare themselves competent (positive conflict) or not competent (negative conflict) to act in the same administrative matter (case). The regulations that determine the authorities responsible for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction contain certain ambiguities, which can be interpreted as overlapping jurisdiction for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction, on the one hand, and gaps in terms of jurisdiction for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction between certain categories of administrative entities, on the other hand. In this sense, the paper talks about the ‘conflict of jurisdiction’, in the first case ‘positive’, and in the second ‘negative’. We are not talking about real conflicts of jurisdiction, because they can arise only with respect to a specific administrative matter, but about vague norms that regulate or fail to adequately regulate jurisdiction for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction, which can lead to problems in determining the authority responsible for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction.

Pravo i privredaVol. 62(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Law, logistics, and international trade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.