Simplified Neural Network-Based Models for Oil Flow Rate Prediction

Available neural network-based models for predicting the oil flow rate (q<sub>o</sub>) in the Niger Delta are not simplified and are developed from limited data sources. The reproducibility of these models is not feasible as the models’ details are not published. This study developed simplified and reproducible three, five, and six-input variables neural-based models for estimating q<sub>o</sub> using 283 datasets from 21 wells across fields in the Niger Delta. The neural-based models were developed using maximum-minimum (max.-min.) normalized and clip-normalized datasets. The performances and the generalizability of the developed models with published datasets were determined using some statistical indices: coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), average relative error (ARE) and average absolute relative error (AARE). The results indicate that the 3-input-based neural models had overall R<sup>2</sup>, MSE, and RMSE values of 0.9689, 9.6185x10<sup>-4 </sup>and 0.0310, respectively, for the max.-min. normalizing method and R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9663, MSE of 5.7986x10<sup>-3</sup> and RMSE of 0.0762 for the clip scaling approach. The 5-input-based models resulted in R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9865, MSE of 5.7790×10<sup>-4</sup> and RMSE of 0.0240 for the max.-min. scaling method and R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9720, MSE of 3.7243x10<sup>-3</sup> and RMSE of 0.0610 for the clip scaling approach. Also, the 6-input-based models had R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9809, MSE of 8.7520x10<sup>-4</sup> and RMSE of 0.0296 for the max.-min. normalizing approach and R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9791, MSE of 3.8859 x 10<sup>-3</sup> and RMSE of 0.0623 for the clip scaling method. Furthermore, the generality performance of the simplified neural-based models resulted in R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE, ARE, and AAPRE of 0.9644, 205.78, 0.0248, and 0.1275, respectively, for the 3-input-based neural model and R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9264, RMSE of 2089.93, ARE of 0.1656 and AARE of 0.2267 for the 6-input-based neural model. The neural-based models predicted q<sub>o</sub> were more comparable to the test datasets than some existing correlations, as the predicted q<sub>o</sub> result was the lowest error indices. Besides, the overall relative importance of the neural-based models’ input variables on q<sub>o</sub> prediction is S>GLR>P<sub>wh</sub>>T/T<sub>sc</sub>>γ<sub>o</sub>>BS&W>γ<sub>g</sub>. The simplified neural-based models performed better than some empirical correlations from the assessment indicators. Therefore, the models should apply as tools for oil flow rate prediction in the Niger Delta fields, as the necessary details to implement the models are made visible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Petroleum Science and Engineering
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20240802.12
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simplified Neural Network-Based Models for Oil Flow Rate Prediction

Anietie Ndarake Okon, Okorie Ekwe Agwu, Uduak Umana
Petroleum Science and Engineering
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

Simplified Neural Network-Based Models for Oil Flow Rate Prediction

Anietie Ndarake Okon, Okorie Ekwe Agwu, Uduak Umana
article en

Abstract

Available neural network-based models for predicting the oil flow rate (q<sub>o</sub>) in the Niger Delta are not simplified and are developed from limited data sources. The reproducibility of these models is not feasible as the models’ details are not published. This study developed simplified and reproducible three, five, and six-input variables neural-based models for estimating q<sub>o</sub> using 283 datasets from 21 wells across fields in the Niger Delta. The neural-based models were developed using maximum-minimum (max.-min.) normalized and clip-normalized datasets. The performances and the generalizability of the developed models with published datasets were determined using some statistical indices: coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), average relative error (ARE) and average absolute relative error (AARE). The results indicate that the 3-input-based neural models had overall R<sup>2</sup>, MSE, and RMSE values of 0.9689, 9.6185x10<sup>-4 </sup>and 0.0310, respectively, for the max.-min. normalizing method and R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9663, MSE of 5.7986x10<sup>-3</sup> and RMSE of 0.0762 for the clip scaling approach. The 5-input-based models resulted in R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9865, MSE of 5.7790×10<sup>-4</sup> and RMSE of 0.0240 for the max.-min. scaling method and R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9720, MSE of 3.7243x10<sup>-3</sup> and RMSE of 0.0610 for the clip scaling approach. Also, the 6-input-based models had R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9809, MSE of 8.7520x10<sup>-4</sup> and RMSE of 0.0296 for the max.-min. normalizing approach and R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9791, MSE of 3.8859 x 10<sup>-3</sup> and RMSE of 0.0623 for the clip scaling method. Furthermore, the generality performance of the simplified neural-based models resulted in R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE, ARE, and AAPRE of 0.9644, 205.78, 0.0248, and 0.1275, respectively, for the 3-input-based neural model and R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9264, RMSE of 2089.93, ARE of 0.1656 and AARE of 0.2267 for the 6-input-based neural model. The neural-based models predicted q<sub>o</sub> were more comparable to the test datasets than some existing correlations, as the predicted q<sub>o</sub> result was the lowest error indices. Besides, the overall relative importance of the neural-based models’ input variables on q<sub>o</sub> prediction is S>GLR>P<sub>wh</sub>>T/T<sub>sc</sub>>γ<sub>o</sub>>BS&W>γ<sub>g</sub>. The simplified neural-based models performed better than some empirical correlations from the assessment indicators. Therefore, the models should apply as tools for oil flow rate prediction in the Niger Delta fields, as the necessary details to implement the models are made visible.

Petroleum Science and EngineeringVol. 8(2)
University of Uyo (NG)
Texas Emerging Technology Fund, Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg, Secretário de Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, Governo do Estado de Parana, Tertiary Education Trust Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.