Analysis of Financial Performances for Monster Beverage: Comparison with KO, PEP and KDP

The soft drink market is a growth market with diverse products including carbonated drinks, energy drinks, sports drinks, ready-to-drink tea, etc., in which demand shifts by consumer behaviours, market innovations, as well as macro environment policies. This study analyzes the financial performance of Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) in comparison with Coca-Cola (KO), PepsiCo (PEP), and Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) by calculating financial metrics and making comparison analysis, and the aim is to find one stock which is worth value investing. Consequently, MNST is worth investing in on account of its outstanding financial metrics including its lower PEG ratio, higher revenue growth rate, and EPS growth rate, meanwhile, MNST stands out with its external factors such as innovation in flavour. The research fills the vacancy of value investing, especially for comparison analysis in the specific four soft drink companies, i.e., MNST, KO, PEP, and KDP. Though the research needs more predicting models, these results still can help investors make decisions in value investing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/108/20242034
Primary Topic
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Financial Performances for Monster Beverage: Comparison with KO, PEP and KDP

Yifan Wang
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
article

Analysis of Financial Performances for Monster Beverage: Comparison with KO, PEP and KDP

Yifan Wang
article en

Abstract

The soft drink market is a growth market with diverse products including carbonated drinks, energy drinks, sports drinks, ready-to-drink tea, etc., in which demand shifts by consumer behaviours, market innovations, as well as macro environment policies. This study analyzes the financial performance of Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) in comparison with Coca-Cola (KO), PepsiCo (PEP), and Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) by calculating financial metrics and making comparison analysis, and the aim is to find one stock which is worth value investing. Consequently, MNST is worth investing in on account of its outstanding financial metrics including its lower PEG ratio, higher revenue growth rate, and EPS growth rate, meanwhile, MNST stands out with its external factors such as innovation in flavour. The research fills the vacancy of value investing, especially for comparison analysis in the specific four soft drink companies, i.e., MNST, KO, PEP, and KDP. Though the research needs more predicting models, these results still can help investors make decisions in value investing.

Advances in Economics Management and Political SciencesVol. 108(1)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.