Living wills vis a vis right to die

The word “Euthanasia” relates to two different words from the Greek language “Eu" which indicates "good" and "Thanatosis" which indicates "death”, suggesting a “satisfactory Death” or “easy and painless Death” The phrase “mercy killing” has become associated with this meaning. It comprises inflicting painless death on a person suffering from an incurable and dreadful illness. It’s the practice of terminating a person’s life by administering a lethal injection or ceasing medical treatment. Informed and shared decision‑making between the patient and the health professional caring for him or her is crucial for the quality of care and its outcomes. Living wills are nothing more than a tangible representation of this truth. As a result of their legal approval, patients’ autonomy has been recognized. However, there are some differences in the regulations that have been adopted, and the health practice linked with these documents raises a number of practical and ethical questions that should be considered. Living-will is a written statement depicting individuals’ directions regarding future medical treatment in situations in which they are no longer able to express informed consent. Based on the secondary literature and substantiated with empirical findings, it carves out the need for death preparedness in general and endorsing living-will in particular. The paper covers the prevailing legislations and legal measures permitting passive euthanasia in different countries including India. It further entails all the essential requisites for writing a ‘living-will’ incorporating all the procedures and steps needed to be followed. A thorough assessment of the current accessible literature on living will has been conducted, just to focus on the knowledge of euthanasia in detail. Most importantly, the social impact of the concept of euthanasia needs to be understood by the society. Moreover, it must be considered that euthanasia is different from suicide. Few communities may show the interference of their religion with euthanasia. So it is essential to enlighten the idea of euthanasia in legal ways for different countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IP International Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicological Sciences
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijfmts.2024.019
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Living wills vis a vis right to die

O. Gambhir Singh, Navneet Ray, Hardik Kumar Meher, Jamim Apsarin
IP International Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicological Sciences
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Living wills vis a vis right to die

O. Gambhir Singh, Navneet Ray, Hardik Kumar Meher, Jamim Apsarin
article en

Abstract

The word “Euthanasia” relates to two different words from the Greek language “Eu" which indicates "good" and "Thanatosis" which indicates "death”, suggesting a “satisfactory Death” or “easy and painless Death” The phrase “mercy killing” has become associated with this meaning. It comprises inflicting painless death on a person suffering from an incurable and dreadful illness. It’s the practice of terminating a person’s life by administering a lethal injection or ceasing medical treatment. Informed and shared decision‑making between the patient and the health professional caring for him or her is crucial for the quality of care and its outcomes. Living wills are nothing more than a tangible representation of this truth. As a result of their legal approval, patients’ autonomy has been recognized. However, there are some differences in the regulations that have been adopted, and the health practice linked with these documents raises a number of practical and ethical questions that should be considered. Living-will is a written statement depicting individuals’ directions regarding future medical treatment in situations in which they are no longer able to express informed consent. Based on the secondary literature and substantiated with empirical findings, it carves out the need for death preparedness in general and endorsing living-will in particular. The paper covers the prevailing legislations and legal measures permitting passive euthanasia in different countries including India. It further entails all the essential requisites for writing a ‘living-will’ incorporating all the procedures and steps needed to be followed. A thorough assessment of the current accessible literature on living will has been conducted, just to focus on the knowledge of euthanasia in detail. Most importantly, the social impact of the concept of euthanasia needs to be understood by the society. Moreover, it must be considered that euthanasia is different from suicide. Few communities may show the interference of their religion with euthanasia. So it is essential to enlighten the idea of euthanasia in legal ways for different countries.

IP International Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicological SciencesVol. 9(3)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.