When Do You Start Counting? Revisiting Counting and Pnueli Modalities in Timed Logics

Pnueli first noticed that certain simple 'counting' properties appear to be inexpressible in popular timed temporal logics such as Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL). This interesting observation has since been studied extensively, culminating in strong timed logics that are capable of expressing such properties yet remain decidable. A slightly more general case, namely where one asserts the existence of a sequence of events in an arbitrary interval of the form <a, b> (instead of an upper-bound interval of the form [0, b>, which starts from the current point in time), has however not been addressed satisfactorily in the existing literature. We show that counting in [0, b> is in fact as powerful as counting in <a, b>; moreover, the general property 'there exist x', x'' in I such that x' <= x'' and phi(x', x'') holds' can be expressed in Extended Metric Interval Temporal Logic (EMITL) with only [0, b>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.408.5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Do You Start Counting? Revisiting Counting and Pnueli Modalities in Timed Logics

Hsi-Ming Ho, Khushraj Madnani
1 citations
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
Formal Methods in Verification
0.36
article

When Do You Start Counting? Revisiting Counting and Pnueli Modalities in Timed Logics

Hsi-Ming Ho, Khushraj Madnani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pnueli first noticed that certain simple 'counting' properties appear to be inexpressible in popular timed temporal logics such as Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL). This interesting observation has since been studied extensively, culminating in strong timed logics that are capable of expressing such properties yet remain decidable. A slightly more general case, namely where one asserts the existence of a sequence of events in an arbitrary interval of the form <a, b> (instead of an upper-bound interval of the form [0, b>, which starts from the current point in time), has however not been addressed satisfactorily in the existing literature. We show that counting in [0, b> is in fact as powerful as counting in <a, b>; moreover, the general property 'there exist x', x'' in I such that x' <= x'' and phi(x', x'') holds' can be expressed in Extended Metric Interval Temporal Logic (EMITL) with only [0, b>.

Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer ScienceVol. 408
University of Sussex (GB), Max Planck Institute for Software Systems (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Formal Methods in Verification
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.