Analyzing Question Characteristics Influencing ChatGPT’s Performance in 3000 USMLE®-Style Questions

ChatGPT demonstrated proficiency close to the passing threshold for USMLE® Step 2CK. Performance varied by category, question type, and difficulty. These findings aid medical educators make their exams more AI-proof and inform the integration of AI tools like ChatGPT into teaching strategies. For students, understanding the model's limitations and capabilities ensures it is used as an auxiliary resource to foster active learning rather than abusing it as a study replacement. This study highlights the need for further refinement and improvement in AI models for medical education and decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Science Educator
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02176-9
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Question Characteristics Influencing ChatGPT’s Performance in 3000 USMLE®-Style Questions

Leonard Knoedler, Bohdan Pomahač, Sebastian Cotofana, Martin Kauke‐Navarro et al.
9 citations
Medical Science Educator
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.08
article

Analyzing Question Characteristics Influencing ChatGPT’s Performance in 3000 USMLE®-Style Questions

Leonard Knoedler, Bohdan Pomahač, Sebastian Cotofana, Martin Kauke‐Navarro, Michael G. Alfertshofer, Stefan G. Tullius, Samuel A. Knoedler, Adriana C. Panayi, Cosima C. Hoch, Dennis Paul Orgill, William Gerald Austen
article en
9 citations

Abstract

ChatGPT demonstrated proficiency close to the passing threshold for USMLE® Step 2CK. Performance varied by category, question type, and difficulty. These findings aid medical educators make their exams more AI-proof and inform the integration of AI tools like ChatGPT into teaching strategies. For students, understanding the model's limitations and capabilities ensures it is used as an auxiliary resource to foster active learning rather than abusing it as a study replacement. This study highlights the need for further refinement and improvement in AI models for medical education and decision-making.

Medical Science EducatorVol. 35(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Yale New Haven Hospital (US), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Heidelberg University (DE), TUM Klinikum (DE), University Hospital Regensburg (DE), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Technical University of Munich (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.