Rhetorics of Authenticity: Ethics, Ethos, and Artificial Intelligence

This article examines issues of authenticity involved in using generative AI to compose technical and professional communication (TPC) documents. Authenticity is defined through an Aristotelian understanding of ethos, which includes goodwill ( eunoia), practical wisdom ( phronesis), virtuousness ( arete), and Fromm's concepts of true self and pseudo self. The authors conducted an initial analysis of AI affordances that align with TPC concerns—genre, plain language, and grammatical/mechanical correctness. The preliminary results show that these affordances may be limited by issues of inauthenticity. The authors suggest that in order to address AI's limitations, writers should adopt a rhetoric of authenticity via real-world engagement, human centeredness, and personal style.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519241280639
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rhetorics of Authenticity: Ethics, Ethos, and Artificial Intelligence

Richard Johnson-Sheehan, Paul Thompson Hunter, Adrianna Deptula
6 citations
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
23.45
article

Rhetorics of Authenticity: Ethics, Ethos, and Artificial Intelligence

Richard Johnson-Sheehan, Paul Thompson Hunter, Adrianna Deptula
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This article examines issues of authenticity involved in using generative AI to compose technical and professional communication (TPC) documents. Authenticity is defined through an Aristotelian understanding of ethos, which includes goodwill ( eunoia), practical wisdom ( phronesis), virtuousness ( arete), and Fromm's concepts of true self and pseudo self. The authors conducted an initial analysis of AI affordances that align with TPC concerns—genre, plain language, and grammatical/mechanical correctness. The preliminary results show that these affordances may be limited by issues of inauthenticity. The authors suggest that in order to address AI's limitations, writers should adopt a rhetoric of authenticity via real-world engagement, human centeredness, and personal style.

Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationVol. 39(1)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
23.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.