A closer look at individual collisions of dust aggregates: material mixing and exchange on microscopic scales

ABSTRACT Collisions between aggregates with different histories and compositions are expected to be commonplace in dynamically active protoplanetary discs. None the less, relatively little is known about how collisions themselves may contribute to the resulting mixing of material. Here, we use state-of-the-art granular dynamics simulations to investigate mixing between target/projectile material in a variety of individual aggregate-aggregate collisions, and use the results to discuss the efficiency of collisional mixing in protoplanetary environments. We consider sticking collisions (up to 10–20 m s–1 for our set-up) and disruptive collisions (40 m s–1) of ballistic particle–cluster aggregation (BPCA) and ballistic cluster–cluster aggregation (BCCA) clusters, and quantify mixing in the resulting fragments on both individual fragment and sub-aggregate levels. We find that the mass fraction of material that can be considered to be ‘well-mixed’ (i.e. locally made up of a mix of target and projectile material) to be limited, typically between 3 and 6 per cent for compact BPCA precursors, and increasing to 20–30 per cent for more porous BCCA clusters. The larger fragments produced in disruptive collisions are equally heterogeneous, suggesting aggregate–aggregate collisions are a relatively inefficient way of mixing material with different origins on small scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2247
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A closer look at individual collisions of dust aggregates: material mixing and exchange on microscopic scales

Mark Oosterloo, Sebastiaan Krijt, Sota Arakawa, Hidekazu Tanaka
3 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
1.01
article

A closer look at individual collisions of dust aggregates: material mixing and exchange on microscopic scales

Mark Oosterloo, Sebastiaan Krijt, Sota Arakawa, Hidekazu Tanaka
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Collisions between aggregates with different histories and compositions are expected to be commonplace in dynamically active protoplanetary discs. None the less, relatively little is known about how collisions themselves may contribute to the resulting mixing of material. Here, we use state-of-the-art granular dynamics simulations to investigate mixing between target/projectile material in a variety of individual aggregate-aggregate collisions, and use the results to discuss the efficiency of collisional mixing in protoplanetary environments. We consider sticking collisions (up to 10–20 m s–1 for our set-up) and disruptive collisions (40 m s–1) of ballistic particle–cluster aggregation (BPCA) and ballistic cluster–cluster aggregation (BCCA) clusters, and quantify mixing in the resulting fragments on both individual fragment and sub-aggregate levels. We find that the mass fraction of material that can be considered to be ‘well-mixed’ (i.e. locally made up of a mix of target and projectile material) to be limited, typically between 3 and 6 per cent for compact BPCA precursors, and increasing to 20–30 per cent for more porous BCCA clusters. The larger fragments produced in disruptive collisions are equally heterogeneous, suggesting aggregate–aggregate collisions are a relatively inefficient way of mixing material with different origins on small scales.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 534(3)
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JP), University of Groningen (NL), Tohoku University (JP), University of Exeter (GB), Czech Academy of Sciences, Astronomical Institute (CZ), Astronomical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.