Comparing pRF Mapping Estimates for Words and Checker Patterns

Functional MRI responses from voxels in the visual cortex are driven by stimuli within restricted regions of the visual field, their so-called population receptive fields (pRF). The central position and size of every voxel’s receptive field can be quantified using pRF mapping. In a previous report, we measured the pRF centers of individual voxels using words and contrast-reversing checker patterns shown within the stimulation area. The pRF centers measured with words differed from those measured with checkers. Voxels with a pRF center in the near periphery (5-10 degrees visual angle from the fixation) are more eccentric (1-3 degrees) when measured with checkers compared to words. To gain a deeper understanding of these effects, we acquired new datasets that differed significantly from the previous data. These variations included using different MRI scanners, fields of view, and acquisition sequences with either high-temporal or high-spatial resolution. Additionally, we adapted the used stimuli (such as variations in bar width and speed, flickering frequency) and participant populations, including individuals with both uncorrected and corrected visual acuity. Data were analyzed using a highly reproducible containerized public analysis platform (prfprepare and prfanalyze-vista). Results confirm the main effect in higher visual areas (hV4, VO1, IPS0-1). Further, initial measurements suggest specific stimulus manipulations (including defocus) impact the size of the change in eccentricity. Moreover, these manipulations may have different impacts on the eccentricity shift measured in different visual field maps. These findings offer a compelling starting point to further investigate stimuli induced pRF differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1131
Primary Topic
Web Data Mining and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing pRF Mapping Estimates for Words and Checker Patterns

Garikoitz Lerma‐Usabiaga, Pedro M. Paz‐Alonso, David Linhardt, Brian A. Wandell et al.
Journal of Vision
Web Data Mining and Analysis
article

Comparing pRF Mapping Estimates for Words and Checker Patterns

Garikoitz Lerma‐Usabiaga, Pedro M. Paz‐Alonso, David Linhardt, Brian A. Wandell, Christian Windischberger, Yongning Lei
article en

Abstract

Functional MRI responses from voxels in the visual cortex are driven by stimuli within restricted regions of the visual field, their so-called population receptive fields (pRF). The central position and size of every voxel’s receptive field can be quantified using pRF mapping. In a previous report, we measured the pRF centers of individual voxels using words and contrast-reversing checker patterns shown within the stimulation area. The pRF centers measured with words differed from those measured with checkers. Voxels with a pRF center in the near periphery (5-10 degrees visual angle from the fixation) are more eccentric (1-3 degrees) when measured with checkers compared to words. To gain a deeper understanding of these effects, we acquired new datasets that differed significantly from the previous data. These variations included using different MRI scanners, fields of view, and acquisition sequences with either high-temporal or high-spatial resolution. Additionally, we adapted the used stimuli (such as variations in bar width and speed, flickering frequency) and participant populations, including individuals with both uncorrected and corrected visual acuity. Data were analyzed using a highly reproducible containerized public analysis platform (prfprepare and prfanalyze-vista). Results confirm the main effect in higher visual areas (hV4, VO1, IPS0-1). Further, initial measurements suggest specific stimulus manipulations (including defocus) impact the size of the change in eccentricity. Moreover, these manipulations may have different impacts on the eccentricity shift measured in different visual field maps. These findings offer a compelling starting point to further investigate stimuli induced pRF differences.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Ikerbasque (ES), Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (ES), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Web Data Mining and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.