“Automatic” online corrections during a reaching task are associated with individual differences in executive function.

Previous research has demonstrated that the dorsal visual stream is able to execute rapid online movement corrections to sudden changes in target position. This “automatic pilot” can operate in the absence of visual awareness, and even under circumstances where participants are instructed to not correct their movements. In the current study, we examined the extent to which these “automatic” corrections might be related to individual differences in executive control. To examine this, healthy adult participants (n=80) completed two versions of the automatic pilot task (APT) on a touch screen: 1) a “correct” condition in which participants were instructed to correct their movement to the new target location on jump trials, and 2) an “ignore” condition in which participants were told to ignore any target jumps, and point to the initial target location. In addition to completing these two versions of the APT, participants also completed the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), in which they were asked to respond when a number was presented, except for the number 3. Finally, participants completed questionnaires indexing executive attention, impulsivity, and executive function including the Adult ADHD Self Report Scale (ASRS), the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), and the Behavioural Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A). Our results indicated that, similar to previous research, participants made significantly more corrections to target jumps in the “correct” condition, compared to the “ignore” condition. Importantly, “automatic” unintended corrections in the “ignore” condition were significantly correlated with poorer scores on the ASRS, the CFQ, and the BRIEF-A. However, unintended corrections were not correlated with errors or reaction times on the SART. These results suggest that the APT is sensitive to individual differences in executive function, and may be useful as a visuomotor measure of response inhibition and cognitive control in both healthy and clinical populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1067
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Automatic” online corrections during a reaching task are associated with individual differences in executive function.

Christopher L. Striemer, Branden T. Otte
Journal of Vision
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

“Automatic” online corrections during a reaching task are associated with individual differences in executive function.

Christopher L. Striemer, Branden T. Otte
article en

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that the dorsal visual stream is able to execute rapid online movement corrections to sudden changes in target position. This “automatic pilot” can operate in the absence of visual awareness, and even under circumstances where participants are instructed to not correct their movements. In the current study, we examined the extent to which these “automatic” corrections might be related to individual differences in executive control. To examine this, healthy adult participants (n=80) completed two versions of the automatic pilot task (APT) on a touch screen: 1) a “correct” condition in which participants were instructed to correct their movement to the new target location on jump trials, and 2) an “ignore” condition in which participants were told to ignore any target jumps, and point to the initial target location. In addition to completing these two versions of the APT, participants also completed the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), in which they were asked to respond when a number was presented, except for the number 3. Finally, participants completed questionnaires indexing executive attention, impulsivity, and executive function including the Adult ADHD Self Report Scale (ASRS), the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), and the Behavioural Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A). Our results indicated that, similar to previous research, participants made significantly more corrections to target jumps in the “correct” condition, compared to the “ignore” condition. Importantly, “automatic” unintended corrections in the “ignore” condition were significantly correlated with poorer scores on the ASRS, the CFQ, and the BRIEF-A. However, unintended corrections were not correlated with errors or reaction times on the SART. These results suggest that the APT is sensitive to individual differences in executive function, and may be useful as a visuomotor measure of response inhibition and cognitive control in both healthy and clinical populations.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Alberta (CA), MacEwan University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.