Order-Dependent Functional Brain Connectivity in a Cue-Separation Grasp Task

Prehension involves location-dependent reach transport and orientation-dependent grasp components. To understand how the brain integrates object location and orientation for grasp, we studied how the order of transport / grasp cues influences whole brain functional connectivity. We collected BOLD signal data from 12 participants in an Event-related fMRI Experiment. Participants were instructed to reach and grasp a cube illuminated to the left or right of midline (Location Cue: L) and a verbal instruction to orient the hand for vertical or horizontal grasp (Orientation Cue: O). The order of these cues (LO vs. OL) varied randomly. fMRI data were analyzed separately based on three predictors: Delay 1 (between the two cues), Delay 2 (between the 2nd cue and go signal), and an Action Phase. Graph Theory Analysis was performed based on 200 regions of interest (nodes) at each phase. Preliminary analysis based on 3 participants: During Delay 1, nodes coalesced into three modules: 1) a central parietofrontal strip approximating primary somatomotor cortex, 2) two more anterior-posterior premotor / visuomotor parietofrontal regions, and 3) a ring of cortex skirting 1+2 but with no occipital/temporal involvement. Occipital involvement increased in Delay 2. Parietofrontal Modules 1 + 2 joined (reducing to two modules) after Delay 2 for LO and the action phase for OL, i.e., always after the location cue. The Global Clustering Coefficient is always reduced in the action phase. We conclude the order of L-O cues influences modularity, such that location information produces more parietofrontal ‘binding’, presumably in preparation for transport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1008
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Order-Dependent Functional Brain Connectivity in a Cue-Separation Grasp Task

Simona Monaco, Lina Musa, Ada Le, Erez Freud et al.
Journal of Vision
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Order-Dependent Functional Brain Connectivity in a Cue-Separation Grasp Task

Simona Monaco, Lina Musa, Ada Le, Erez Freud, Amirhossein Ghaderi, J. Douglas Crawford, Gaelle N. Luabeya
article en

Abstract

Prehension involves location-dependent reach transport and orientation-dependent grasp components. To understand how the brain integrates object location and orientation for grasp, we studied how the order of transport / grasp cues influences whole brain functional connectivity. We collected BOLD signal data from 12 participants in an Event-related fMRI Experiment. Participants were instructed to reach and grasp a cube illuminated to the left or right of midline (Location Cue: L) and a verbal instruction to orient the hand for vertical or horizontal grasp (Orientation Cue: O). The order of these cues (LO vs. OL) varied randomly. fMRI data were analyzed separately based on three predictors: Delay 1 (between the two cues), Delay 2 (between the 2nd cue and go signal), and an Action Phase. Graph Theory Analysis was performed based on 200 regions of interest (nodes) at each phase. Preliminary analysis based on 3 participants: During Delay 1, nodes coalesced into three modules: 1) a central parietofrontal strip approximating primary somatomotor cortex, 2) two more anterior-posterior premotor / visuomotor parietofrontal regions, and 3) a ring of cortex skirting 1+2 but with no occipital/temporal involvement. Occipital involvement increased in Delay 2. Parietofrontal Modules 1 + 2 joined (reducing to two modules) after Delay 2 for LO and the action phase for OL, i.e., always after the location cue. The Global Clustering Coefficient is always reduced in the action phase. We conclude the order of L-O cues influences modularity, such that location information produces more parietofrontal ‘binding’, presumably in preparation for transport.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
York University (CA), University of Trento (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.