The Eyes Still Have It: Eye Processing is a Distinct Deficit in Developmental Prosopagnosia

Numerous studies have demonstrated that efficient processing of the information-rich eye region is important for face recognition. However, the extent to which eye processing is impaired in developmental prosopagnosia (DP) and how these potential impairments contribute to DPs’ face perception deficits remains unclear. To address this, we had 110 DPs and 133 controls perform validated face matching assessments (Cambridge Face Perception Test, Computerized Benton Facial Recognition Test, Same/Different Face Matching Test) and the Georges and Part-Whole tasks to measure feature (eye, nose, mouth, chin, forehead sensitivity) and holistic processing (part-whole holistic advantage) abilities. Regarding feature processing, DPs were most impaired on the eye conditions (Georges eye spacing and size trials, Part-Whole part eye trials) but showed relatively normal mouth (Georges mouth size trials and Part-Whole part mouth trials, though deficient Georges mouth spacing trials) and chin performance. DPs also showed a significantly reduced Part-Whole holistic advantage. We next ran factor analyses in DPs and controls using all the facial feature conditions and holistic advantage. In both groups, we found a three-factor solution: a clearly distinct eye processing factor as well as less distinct lower facial feature (mouth and chin trials) and holistic processing factors. Notably, in regression models using factor scores to predict face perception ability (face matching performance), both DPs and controls showed that eye processing ability predicted the most unique variance, while holistic processing also predicted unique variance. Finally, in a follow-up experiment to determine the generality of DP eye impairments, we examined eye gaze perception and reading emotion from the eyes and found subtle impairments in DPs. In sum, these results demonstrate that, in both DPs and controls, eye processing ability is distinct from more general facial feature processing and holistic processing and is a crucial contributor to DP face perception deficits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1060
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Eyes Still Have It: Eye Processing is a Distinct Deficit in Developmental Prosopagnosia

Joseph DeGutis, Alison Campbell, Regan Fry, Maruti Mishra et al.
1 citations
Journal of Vision
Language Development and Disorders
0.79
article

The Eyes Still Have It: Eye Processing is a Distinct Deficit in Developmental Prosopagnosia

Joseph DeGutis, Alison Campbell, Regan Fry, Maruti Mishra, Leah Kirsch, Asha Jotwani, Mia Haidamus
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that efficient processing of the information-rich eye region is important for face recognition. However, the extent to which eye processing is impaired in developmental prosopagnosia (DP) and how these potential impairments contribute to DPs’ face perception deficits remains unclear. To address this, we had 110 DPs and 133 controls perform validated face matching assessments (Cambridge Face Perception Test, Computerized Benton Facial Recognition Test, Same/Different Face Matching Test) and the Georges and Part-Whole tasks to measure feature (eye, nose, mouth, chin, forehead sensitivity) and holistic processing (part-whole holistic advantage) abilities. Regarding feature processing, DPs were most impaired on the eye conditions (Georges eye spacing and size trials, Part-Whole part eye trials) but showed relatively normal mouth (Georges mouth size trials and Part-Whole part mouth trials, though deficient Georges mouth spacing trials) and chin performance. DPs also showed a significantly reduced Part-Whole holistic advantage. We next ran factor analyses in DPs and controls using all the facial feature conditions and holistic advantage. In both groups, we found a three-factor solution: a clearly distinct eye processing factor as well as less distinct lower facial feature (mouth and chin trials) and holistic processing factors. Notably, in regression models using factor scores to predict face perception ability (face matching performance), both DPs and controls showed that eye processing ability predicted the most unique variance, while holistic processing also predicted unique variance. Finally, in a follow-up experiment to determine the generality of DP eye impairments, we examined eye gaze perception and reading emotion from the eyes and found subtle impairments in DPs. In sum, these results demonstrate that, in both DPs and controls, eye processing ability is distinct from more general facial feature processing and holistic processing and is a crucial contributor to DP face perception deficits.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Boston University (US), California State University, Bakersfield (US), Harvard University (US), VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Language Development and Disorders
0.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.