Eye-Gaze Patterns and Motivational Factors Influence Intuitive Physical Judgments

When reasoning about the world around them, people rely extensively on their inferences about physical scenarios. Examples of how these inferences can be flawed are well-documented, including in real-world optical illusions. In the current work, we test the hypothesis that our intuitive physical judgments can change when we are motivated to see a particular outcome in a physical scenario. While undergoing eye-tracking, participants (N = 57) were presented with images of block towers that varied in stability and were rewarded for correctly judging whether each tower would fall or remain standing under the influence of gravity. We also incentivized participants (N = 29) to judge towers as stable or unstable using monetary bonuses; the bonuses did not depend on the participants’ responses, so the reward-maximizing strategy was to respond accurately. We hypothesized that people would be motivated to respond that a given tower was stable versus unstable when financially incentivized to make a certain stability judgment. We found that on average, participants were more likely to judge the tower as stable when motivated to see it as stable than when motivated to see it as unstable. Moreover, we found that subjects’ fixation patterns were significantly correlated with the average fixation patterns of other subjects who made the same choice, suggesting that how people sample information contributes to their judgments about physical scenes. Participants’ fixation patterns were also significantly correlated with the average fixation patterns of other subjects who had the same motivation, indicating that motivation may influence how people sample information when making judgments. Further analysis will assess whether participants focus on a tower’s mechanical failure points and/or look where they predict the blocks may fall when they judge a given tower to be unstable. This study may shed light on potential limitations of human physical scene understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1071
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eye-Gaze Patterns and Motivational Factors Influence Intuitive Physical Judgments

Ren Calabro, Yuan Chang Leong, Kannon Bhattacharyya, Meriel Doyle
Journal of Vision
Behavioral Health and Interventions
article

Eye-Gaze Patterns and Motivational Factors Influence Intuitive Physical Judgments

Ren Calabro, Yuan Chang Leong, Kannon Bhattacharyya, Meriel Doyle
article en

Abstract

When reasoning about the world around them, people rely extensively on their inferences about physical scenarios. Examples of how these inferences can be flawed are well-documented, including in real-world optical illusions. In the current work, we test the hypothesis that our intuitive physical judgments can change when we are motivated to see a particular outcome in a physical scenario. While undergoing eye-tracking, participants (N = 57) were presented with images of block towers that varied in stability and were rewarded for correctly judging whether each tower would fall or remain standing under the influence of gravity. We also incentivized participants (N = 29) to judge towers as stable or unstable using monetary bonuses; the bonuses did not depend on the participants’ responses, so the reward-maximizing strategy was to respond accurately. We hypothesized that people would be motivated to respond that a given tower was stable versus unstable when financially incentivized to make a certain stability judgment. We found that on average, participants were more likely to judge the tower as stable when motivated to see it as stable than when motivated to see it as unstable. Moreover, we found that subjects’ fixation patterns were significantly correlated with the average fixation patterns of other subjects who made the same choice, suggesting that how people sample information contributes to their judgments about physical scenes. Participants’ fixation patterns were also significantly correlated with the average fixation patterns of other subjects who had the same motivation, indicating that motivation may influence how people sample information when making judgments. Further analysis will assess whether participants focus on a tower’s mechanical failure points and/or look where they predict the blocks may fall when they judge a given tower to be unstable. This study may shed light on potential limitations of human physical scene understanding.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Chicago (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.