Investigating the effect of real-world background images on spatial working memory representations

Recent work finds that the location of remembered stimuli can be reconstructed from patterns of EEG alpha-band activity throughout a 1 to 2 second memory delay (Foster et al., 2016; Sutterer et al., 2021). This foundational work involved objects being presented on a blank background. Thus, an open question is whether this is the way we use spatial working memory in the real world, where many background cues are present in addition to the target object. To answer this question, we used a delayed spatial estimation task in which participants remembered the location of a target dot presented around fixation while the background alternated block-by-block between a conventional blank background and an image of a real-world setting. We hypothesized that background cues could affect spatial memory representations in opposing ways. Background cues could enhance spatial memory representations by providing a physical cue that can be attended during the memory delay. Alternatively, background cues could serve as a placeholder that can be used in lieu of maintaining the target location throughout the delay. To test between these alternatives, we applied an Inverted Encoding Model (IEM) to the topography of EEG alpha-band power to measure the spatial selectivity for the target location for each background condition. We observed higher spatial selectivity throughout the trial for blank background compared to scene background trials. This observation is consistent with the idea that the presence of background information reduces demands on spatial working memory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1072
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the effect of real-world background images on spatial working memory representations

David Sutterer, Sage Bendickson, Nicholas Schmitz
Journal of Vision
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
article

Investigating the effect of real-world background images on spatial working memory representations

David Sutterer, Sage Bendickson, Nicholas Schmitz
article en

Abstract

Recent work finds that the location of remembered stimuli can be reconstructed from patterns of EEG alpha-band activity throughout a 1 to 2 second memory delay (Foster et al., 2016; Sutterer et al., 2021). This foundational work involved objects being presented on a blank background. Thus, an open question is whether this is the way we use spatial working memory in the real world, where many background cues are present in addition to the target object. To answer this question, we used a delayed spatial estimation task in which participants remembered the location of a target dot presented around fixation while the background alternated block-by-block between a conventional blank background and an image of a real-world setting. We hypothesized that background cues could affect spatial memory representations in opposing ways. Background cues could enhance spatial memory representations by providing a physical cue that can be attended during the memory delay. Alternatively, background cues could serve as a placeholder that can be used in lieu of maintaining the target location throughout the delay. To test between these alternatives, we applied an Inverted Encoding Model (IEM) to the topography of EEG alpha-band power to measure the spatial selectivity for the target location for each background condition. We observed higher spatial selectivity throughout the trial for blank background compared to scene background trials. This observation is consistent with the idea that the presence of background information reduces demands on spatial working memory.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.