Continuous psychophysics reveals a temporal cost of real-time distractor suppression during ensemble perception

Ensemble perception plays a fundamental role in how our visual system represents complex scenes. It is commonly studied by briefly presenting sets of stimuli to participants and having them report the average across the feature dimension of interest (e.g. orientation). In real scenes, however, multiple feature sets are often present at the same time, and their inputs to the visual system change continuously, due to variability in the environment or eye and head movements of the observer. Here, we developed a new task to test how participants track feature summaries continuously and how irrelevant distractor features affect the precision and time course of ensemble estimates. During 45-second long tracking trials, participants viewed a set of oriented lines that continuously changed orientations, and concurrently rotated a joystick to reproduce the average orientation of those lines. Following previous work using continuous psychophysics (Bonnen et al., 2015), we computed the cross-correlation between the mean target orientation and the response time series, with the peak amplitude of the resulting cross-correlogram reflecting perceptual sensitivity and the peak latency reflecting processing time. We first validated that our novel task produces results that parallel findings from traditional ensemble tasks: the precision of orientation estimates increased when more items were present (p=0.003), and decreased with higher variability of the orientation set (p<0.001). Next, we examined the impact of distractors on tracking performance by adding differently-colored distractor lines. We found lower precision (p=0.001) and a temporal cost of ~100ms (p=0.025) when distractors were present. Together, these results suggest that the presence of distractors in ensemble processing impairs and delays the extraction of relevant feature summaries, and demonstrate the utility of continuous tasks by revealing a temporal cost that may not be captured by traditional reaction time measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1035
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuous psychophysics reveals a temporal cost of real-time distractor suppression during ensemble perception

Viola Stöermer, Kevin Ortego
Journal of Vision
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Continuous psychophysics reveals a temporal cost of real-time distractor suppression during ensemble perception

Viola Stöermer, Kevin Ortego
article en

Abstract

Ensemble perception plays a fundamental role in how our visual system represents complex scenes. It is commonly studied by briefly presenting sets of stimuli to participants and having them report the average across the feature dimension of interest (e.g. orientation). In real scenes, however, multiple feature sets are often present at the same time, and their inputs to the visual system change continuously, due to variability in the environment or eye and head movements of the observer. Here, we developed a new task to test how participants track feature summaries continuously and how irrelevant distractor features affect the precision and time course of ensemble estimates. During 45-second long tracking trials, participants viewed a set of oriented lines that continuously changed orientations, and concurrently rotated a joystick to reproduce the average orientation of those lines. Following previous work using continuous psychophysics (Bonnen et al., 2015), we computed the cross-correlation between the mean target orientation and the response time series, with the peak amplitude of the resulting cross-correlogram reflecting perceptual sensitivity and the peak latency reflecting processing time. We first validated that our novel task produces results that parallel findings from traditional ensemble tasks: the precision of orientation estimates increased when more items were present (p=0.003), and decreased with higher variability of the orientation set (p<0.001). Next, we examined the impact of distractors on tracking performance by adding differently-colored distractor lines. We found lower precision (p=0.001) and a temporal cost of ~100ms (p=0.025) when distractors were present. Together, these results suggest that the presence of distractors in ensemble processing impairs and delays the extraction of relevant feature summaries, and demonstrate the utility of continuous tasks by revealing a temporal cost that may not be captured by traditional reaction time measures.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Dartmouth College (US), Dartmouth Hospital (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.