Reliability of functional localization and activation profiles of category-selective regions using fMRI

Regions of interest (ROI)-based approach is a popular method to study brain activity in cognitive neuroscience research. To what extent are functionally-defined ROIs reliable within individual participants? In a comprehensive, pre-registered fMRI study, we investigated reliability of ROI location and activation profiles across category-selective regions, including bilateral face-selective, body-selective, scene-selective, and object selective regions (FFA1, FFA2, OFA, ATL, pSTS, aSTS, FBA, EBA, PPA, OPA, RSC, and LOC). For each ROI, we examined the reliability of two localization measures: 1) coordinates of peak activation and 2) degrees of cluster overlap, and three activation measures: 1) response amplitudes, 2) selectivity amplitudes, and 3) response patterns. We compared the reliability measures of the ROIs defined within each participant based on either a p-value threshold (p<0.001) or an area threshold of contiguous vertices with the strongest selectivity (≤100 mm2). Because category-selective regions are commonly identified with either images or videos, where videos produce particularly robust activations compared with images in several ROIs, we also compared the reliability measures evoked by either format. All participants (N=30) completed two fMRI sessions viewing images or videos of faces, bodies, scenes, objects, and scrambled objects. Independent data sets were used to define the ROIs and to calculate reliability. Unsurprisingly, we found higher ROI reliability for all measures within- than between-sessions, and reliability was generally higher in the posterior than anterior regions. Notably, reliability was higher for all ROIs defined with images than with videos, with the exception of pSTS and aSTS. Moreover, reliability was consistently higher for ROIs defined with area thresholding than p-value thresholding methods. Together, these findings suggest that the reliability of the category-selective regions depends on specific cortical locations, ROI selection methods, and stimulus formats. Specifically, the use of image presentation and area thresholding to define the ROIs is recommended for most category-selective regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1073
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability of functional localization and activation profiles of category-selective regions using fMRI

Olivia S. Cheung, Haiyang Jin, Lúcia Garrido
Journal of Vision
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Reliability of functional localization and activation profiles of category-selective regions using fMRI

Olivia S. Cheung, Haiyang Jin, Lúcia Garrido
article en

Abstract

Regions of interest (ROI)-based approach is a popular method to study brain activity in cognitive neuroscience research. To what extent are functionally-defined ROIs reliable within individual participants? In a comprehensive, pre-registered fMRI study, we investigated reliability of ROI location and activation profiles across category-selective regions, including bilateral face-selective, body-selective, scene-selective, and object selective regions (FFA1, FFA2, OFA, ATL, pSTS, aSTS, FBA, EBA, PPA, OPA, RSC, and LOC). For each ROI, we examined the reliability of two localization measures: 1) coordinates of peak activation and 2) degrees of cluster overlap, and three activation measures: 1) response amplitudes, 2) selectivity amplitudes, and 3) response patterns. We compared the reliability measures of the ROIs defined within each participant based on either a p-value threshold (p<0.001) or an area threshold of contiguous vertices with the strongest selectivity (≤100 mm2). Because category-selective regions are commonly identified with either images or videos, where videos produce particularly robust activations compared with images in several ROIs, we also compared the reliability measures evoked by either format. All participants (N=30) completed two fMRI sessions viewing images or videos of faces, bodies, scenes, objects, and scrambled objects. Independent data sets were used to define the ROIs and to calculate reliability. Unsurprisingly, we found higher ROI reliability for all measures within- than between-sessions, and reliability was generally higher in the posterior than anterior regions. Notably, reliability was higher for all ROIs defined with images than with videos, with the exception of pSTS and aSTS. Moreover, reliability was consistently higher for ROIs defined with area thresholding than p-value thresholding methods. Together, these findings suggest that the reliability of the category-selective regions depends on specific cortical locations, ROI selection methods, and stimulus formats. Specifically, the use of image presentation and area thresholding to define the ROIs is recommended for most category-selective regions.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
City, University of London (GB), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.