Development of crowding in amblyopia depends on how you measure it.

Crowding is extensive in young children and strabismic amblyopia, so clinical assessment is important. Crowding magnitude (logMAR) is calculated from acuities, with closely-separated optotypes thought to enhance amblyopia screening. Test separations are fixed in optotype proportion (FOP), or in arcmin (FAM). We examined impact of test design on crowding development in normal and amblyopic vision. Crowding magnitude (logMAR) was assessed with close-separation FOP and FAM tests. Crowding magnitude (FOP) = “crowded” HOTV-acuity (0.2 optotype-width separation) – “uncrowded” HOTV-acuity (isolated). Crowding magnitude (FAM) = “crowded” Landolt C-acuity (~2.6’ separation) – “uncrowded” Landolt C-acuity (≥35’ separation). Participants for FOP test were N=44 amblyopes and 100 healthy controls: ≤8yr N=21 anisometropic amblyopes (AA), N=20 strabismic amblyopes (SA) and N=59 controls (C). For FAM test there were N=100 amblyopes and 76 controls: ≤8yr N=14 AAs, N=39 SAs and N=36 Cs. Crowding magnitude reduces with age in control eyes (≤8 yr) for FOP (slope±1SD of -0.02±0.01, P<0.05) and FAM (-0.05±0.01, P<0.05) tests. Patterns of development differ in amblyopia. With the FOP test in SA (≤8 yr), crowding magnitudes are parallel (slopes FE -0.01±0.01 and AE -0.01±0.02; magnitudes±1SE are 0.28±0.02 and 0.42±0.03 logMAR, respectively). In AAs, magnitudes are greater (P<0.05) in fellow (0.34±0.03 logMAR) than amblyopic (0.26±0.02 logMAR) eyes but this pattern reverses <5yrs (0.20±0.1 vs 0.34±0.05 logMAR). With the FAM test, in SAs, crowding reduces in fellow eyes (slope -0.06±0.01, P<0.05; 0.17±0.02 logMAR) but arrest-of-development appears for amblyopic eyes (slope=0.0±0.0; 0.31±0.02 logMAR). In AA, magnitudes are greater (P<0.05) in fellow (0.21±0.03 logMAR), than amblyopic (0.12±0.03 logMAR) eyes, but this pattern reverses >8yr (0.04±0.02 vs 0.09±0.03 logMAR). Development of crowding in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia is different depending on crowded-acuity test used, due to crowding/masking contributions. A crowding-distance test with minimal/no masking may clarify development of crowding in normal and amblyopic vision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1234
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of crowding in amblyopia depends on how you measure it.

Louisa A Haine, Sarah J. Waugh, Maria Fronius, Monika A. Formankiewicz
Journal of Vision
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Development of crowding in amblyopia depends on how you measure it.

Louisa A Haine, Sarah J. Waugh, Maria Fronius, Monika A. Formankiewicz
article en

Abstract

Crowding is extensive in young children and strabismic amblyopia, so clinical assessment is important. Crowding magnitude (logMAR) is calculated from acuities, with closely-separated optotypes thought to enhance amblyopia screening. Test separations are fixed in optotype proportion (FOP), or in arcmin (FAM). We examined impact of test design on crowding development in normal and amblyopic vision. Crowding magnitude (logMAR) was assessed with close-separation FOP and FAM tests. Crowding magnitude (FOP) = “crowded” HOTV-acuity (0.2 optotype-width separation) – “uncrowded” HOTV-acuity (isolated). Crowding magnitude (FAM) = “crowded” Landolt C-acuity (~2.6’ separation) – “uncrowded” Landolt C-acuity (≥35’ separation). Participants for FOP test were N=44 amblyopes and 100 healthy controls: ≤8yr N=21 anisometropic amblyopes (AA), N=20 strabismic amblyopes (SA) and N=59 controls (C). For FAM test there were N=100 amblyopes and 76 controls: ≤8yr N=14 AAs, N=39 SAs and N=36 Cs. Crowding magnitude reduces with age in control eyes (≤8 yr) for FOP (slope±1SD of -0.02±0.01, P<0.05) and FAM (-0.05±0.01, P<0.05) tests. Patterns of development differ in amblyopia. With the FOP test in SA (≤8 yr), crowding magnitudes are parallel (slopes FE -0.01±0.01 and AE -0.01±0.02; magnitudes±1SE are 0.28±0.02 and 0.42±0.03 logMAR, respectively). In AAs, magnitudes are greater (P<0.05) in fellow (0.34±0.03 logMAR) than amblyopic (0.26±0.02 logMAR) eyes but this pattern reverses <5yrs (0.20±0.1 vs 0.34±0.05 logMAR). With the FAM test, in SAs, crowding reduces in fellow eyes (slope -0.06±0.01, P<0.05; 0.17±0.02 logMAR) but arrest-of-development appears for amblyopic eyes (slope=0.0±0.0; 0.31±0.02 logMAR). In AA, magnitudes are greater (P<0.05) in fellow (0.21±0.03 logMAR), than amblyopic (0.12±0.03 logMAR) eyes, but this pattern reverses >8yr (0.04±0.02 vs 0.09±0.03 logMAR). Development of crowding in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia is different depending on crowded-acuity test used, due to crowding/masking contributions. A crowding-distance test with minimal/no masking may clarify development of crowding in normal and amblyopic vision.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University of Huddersfield (GB), Goethe Institut (DE), Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.