Multitask Machine Learning of Contrast Sensitivity Functions

Contrast Sensitivity Functions (CSFs) represent useful diagnostic adjuncts for helping assess both retinal and central visual functionality. Gaussian Process (GP) classifiers have been shown to efficiently estimate individual CSF models by leveraging active machine learning for optimal stimulus selection. Model convergence in these cases can be achieved with between 10 and 50 actively selected stimuli. By assuming model independence, this disjoint process requires sequential estimation to obtain CSF models for multiple eyes or stimulus conditions (e.g., luminance, eccentricity). Conjoint estimators, on the other hand, have now been developed to estimate multiple CSFs simultaneously using an active multitask implementation. In the current study, conjoint CSF estimator performance was compared to disjoint performance on simulated eyes using generative models created from human data. The high degree of expected similarity between CSFs originating from different eyes or conditions allows conjoint learning between the related models. This procedure is designed to enable faster convergence than sequential disjoint model learning. Indeed, conjoint CSF estimation does speed model convergence over disjoint estimation under commonly encountered scenarios. These findings confirm that incorporation of additional information beyond immediate behavioral responses into new machine learning models of vision functions may improve visual system assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1082
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multitask Machine Learning of Contrast Sensitivity Functions

Aaron R. Seitz, Pinakin Gunvant Davey, Dennis L. Barbour, Jacob R. Gardner et al.
1 citations
Journal of Vision
Neural Networks and Applications
0.35
article

Multitask Machine Learning of Contrast Sensitivity Functions

Aaron R. Seitz, Pinakin Gunvant Davey, Dennis L. Barbour, Jacob R. Gardner, Dom Marticorena, Quinn Wai Wong, Ken Wilbur, Zhiting Zhou, Jake Browning
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Contrast Sensitivity Functions (CSFs) represent useful diagnostic adjuncts for helping assess both retinal and central visual functionality. Gaussian Process (GP) classifiers have been shown to efficiently estimate individual CSF models by leveraging active machine learning for optimal stimulus selection. Model convergence in these cases can be achieved with between 10 and 50 actively selected stimuli. By assuming model independence, this disjoint process requires sequential estimation to obtain CSF models for multiple eyes or stimulus conditions (e.g., luminance, eccentricity). Conjoint estimators, on the other hand, have now been developed to estimate multiple CSFs simultaneously using an active multitask implementation. In the current study, conjoint CSF estimator performance was compared to disjoint performance on simulated eyes using generative models created from human data. The high degree of expected similarity between CSFs originating from different eyes or conditions allows conjoint learning between the related models. This procedure is designed to enable faster convergence than sequential disjoint model learning. Indeed, conjoint CSF estimation does speed model convergence over disjoint estimation under commonly encountered scenarios. These findings confirm that incorporation of additional information beyond immediate behavioral responses into new machine learning models of vision functions may improve visual system assessment.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Washington University in St. Louis (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), Universidad del Noreste (MX), Western University of Health Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Neural Networks and Applications
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.