Dichoptic contrast integration across the human visual cortex hierarchy using functional MRI

Introduction: A recent behavioral study by Meier et al. (2023) showed that when the contrast of a non-rivalrous grating is modulated independently in the two eyes, the perceived contrast of the combined stimulus roughly follows the maximum contrast over the two eyes. Here, in a similar paradigm using fMRI, we investigated the neural locus of this behavioral result. Methods: We measured BOLD fMRI signals in early visual cortex (V1 – V3) while participants (n = 10) viewed non-rivalrous dichoptic gratings (2-cpd) that varied slowly in contrast over time in each eye independently at 1/6 and 1/8 Hz. Observers provided a continuous report of perceived contrast over time by positioning a joystick lever. We fit a Minkowski mean [ (L(t)^m + R(t)^m) / 2 ] ^ (1/m) to the behavioral and fMRI time-courses, where L(t) and R(t) are the contrast time-courses in each eye. An exponent parameter of m = 1 is simple averaging, and as m → ∞ the model increases towards a max response in which neural responses or perceived contrast is driven by the eye presented with the highest contrast. Results: The magnitude of m was smallest in V1 (m = 2.00) and increased across the visual hierarchy toward a max model in V2 (m = 5.19) and V3 (m = 8.12). Behavioral responses measured during scanning were consistent with a max model (m = 6.55) and the later stages of the visual hierarchy. Conclusion: Our fMRI results in V1 are similar to a previous fMRI study that used a normalization model (Moradi & Heeger, 2009) to predict V1 BOLD responses. However, the integration of contrast in V1 differs systematically from perceived contrast. BOLD signals in V2 and V3 were consistent with behavioral measurements, implicating these higher visual areas as the neural locus of perceived contrast.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1100
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dichoptic contrast integration across the human visual cortex hierarchy using functional MRI

Geoffrey M. Boynton, Kimberly Meier, Kelly Chang, Kristina Tarczy‐Hornoch et al.
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Dichoptic contrast integration across the human visual cortex hierarchy using functional MRI

Geoffrey M. Boynton, Kimberly Meier, Kelly Chang, Kristina Tarczy‐Hornoch, Ione Fine, Xiyan Li
article en

Abstract

Introduction: A recent behavioral study by Meier et al. (2023) showed that when the contrast of a non-rivalrous grating is modulated independently in the two eyes, the perceived contrast of the combined stimulus roughly follows the maximum contrast over the two eyes. Here, in a similar paradigm using fMRI, we investigated the neural locus of this behavioral result. Methods: We measured BOLD fMRI signals in early visual cortex (V1 – V3) while participants (n = 10) viewed non-rivalrous dichoptic gratings (2-cpd) that varied slowly in contrast over time in each eye independently at 1/6 and 1/8 Hz. Observers provided a continuous report of perceived contrast over time by positioning a joystick lever. We fit a Minkowski mean [ (L(t)^m + R(t)^m) / 2 ] ^ (1/m) to the behavioral and fMRI time-courses, where L(t) and R(t) are the contrast time-courses in each eye. An exponent parameter of m = 1 is simple averaging, and as m → ∞ the model increases towards a max response in which neural responses or perceived contrast is driven by the eye presented with the highest contrast. Results: The magnitude of m was smallest in V1 (m = 2.00) and increased across the visual hierarchy toward a max model in V2 (m = 5.19) and V3 (m = 8.12). Behavioral responses measured during scanning were consistent with a max model (m = 6.55) and the later stages of the visual hierarchy. Conclusion: Our fMRI results in V1 are similar to a previous fMRI study that used a normalization model (Moradi & Heeger, 2009) to predict V1 BOLD responses. However, the integration of contrast in V1 differs systematically from perceived contrast. BOLD signals in V2 and V3 were consistent with behavioral measurements, implicating these higher visual areas as the neural locus of perceived contrast.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Washington (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.