Dynamics of Face Perception: Unraveling the Role of Eyes and Mouth in Neural Processing

Faces, as crucial conveyors of social information, are often studied using static images or dynamic videos to analyze emotional aspects, overlooking the significance of part-based dynamic information in neutral faces. Hence, the extent to which part-based dynamic information, primarily derived from the eyes and mouth, contributes to dynamic face perception remains elusive. In this study, using neutral dynamic face stimuli, we investigate how the brain processes part-based information during dynamic face perception with specific emphasis on its ability to discriminate between forward and backward face videos over time. Participants fixated on a central cross while watching 3-second grayscale muted videos featuring individuals speaking in neutral state. We manipulate the face orientation (right-side-up, upside-down) and the presence of eye blink (with/without blink), and ask participants to indicate the temporal order of the dynamic face videos as forward or backward. The eyes and mouth were contrast-modulated at 6 and 7.5 Hz, respectively. Steady-state visual evoked potentials were recorded from 64 EEG channels. Behavioral results (d' primes > 0) indicate that participants performed the task well. EEG results reveal an orientation effect consistent with the literature. The topographic map of neural responses indicates a central-occipital focus for the eye and a lateral-occipital focus for the mouth. The overall neural response shows that there is a bias towards the mouth when face orientation is right-side-up. We observed that neural responses to eyes tend to be differentially more elevated compared to mouth when there is a blink. In intact faces (forward, right-side-up), the blink information closes the mouth bias. Whereas the most-distorted case (backward, up-side-down) requires a separate search for a cue (blink) in the eyes, suppressing the mouth part. Overall, this study significantly contributes to our understanding of dynamic face perception, emphasizing the role of dynamic part-based information, particularly eyes and mouth movements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1180
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of Face Perception: Unraveling the Role of Eyes and Mouth in Neural Processing

Nihan Alp, Hüseyin Özkan, Çiçek Güney, Yasemin Gunindi
Journal of Vision
Face Recognition and Perception
article

Dynamics of Face Perception: Unraveling the Role of Eyes and Mouth in Neural Processing

Nihan Alp, Hüseyin Özkan, Çiçek Güney, Yasemin Gunindi
article en

Abstract

Faces, as crucial conveyors of social information, are often studied using static images or dynamic videos to analyze emotional aspects, overlooking the significance of part-based dynamic information in neutral faces. Hence, the extent to which part-based dynamic information, primarily derived from the eyes and mouth, contributes to dynamic face perception remains elusive. In this study, using neutral dynamic face stimuli, we investigate how the brain processes part-based information during dynamic face perception with specific emphasis on its ability to discriminate between forward and backward face videos over time. Participants fixated on a central cross while watching 3-second grayscale muted videos featuring individuals speaking in neutral state. We manipulate the face orientation (right-side-up, upside-down) and the presence of eye blink (with/without blink), and ask participants to indicate the temporal order of the dynamic face videos as forward or backward. The eyes and mouth were contrast-modulated at 6 and 7.5 Hz, respectively. Steady-state visual evoked potentials were recorded from 64 EEG channels. Behavioral results (d' primes > 0) indicate that participants performed the task well. EEG results reveal an orientation effect consistent with the literature. The topographic map of neural responses indicates a central-occipital focus for the eye and a lateral-occipital focus for the mouth. The overall neural response shows that there is a bias towards the mouth when face orientation is right-side-up. We observed that neural responses to eyes tend to be differentially more elevated compared to mouth when there is a blink. In intact faces (forward, right-side-up), the blink information closes the mouth bias. Whereas the most-distorted case (backward, up-side-down) requires a separate search for a cue (blink) in the eyes, suppressing the mouth part. Overall, this study significantly contributes to our understanding of dynamic face perception, emphasizing the role of dynamic part-based information, particularly eyes and mouth movements.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Sabancı Üniversitesi (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.