Working memory errors from distraction are not influenced by sensory noise at encoding

Prior research suggests that ongoing sensory input during the delay period of a visual working memory task interferes with the storage of remembered information. However, it is unclear whether sensory uncertainty during encoding increases susceptibility to interference or whether memories are relatively stable once information is encoded (even if encoding is highly inaccurate). Here, we tested whether distracting stimuli influenced memory accuracy while simultaneously manipulating sensory noise by changing the width of a bandpass filter applied to white noise stimuli to titrate the amount of orientation information in each remembered stimulus. In a behavioral experiment (N=24), participants viewed a phase-reversing orientation grating rendered at one of two levels of sensory noise (high and low) for 500 ms, followed by a 3,000 ms delay with one of three distractor conditions (no distractor, ignore oriented white noise distractor, or attend oriented white noise distractor). At the end of each trial subjects responded by rotating a white line to match the remembered orientation. We found strong evidence that increasing noise in the remembered oriented grating decreased working memory performance (BF10=3.49e12). Notably, the presence of oriented distractors interfered with working memory performance (BF10=72.2), with evidence of memory attraction toward the orientation of the noise distractor. However, there was no interaction between stimulus noise and distractor presence (BF10=0.13). These data provide evidence that while working memory representations are prone to adaptive distortions during delay periods, these distortions are not modulated by sensory noise during encoding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1173
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working memory errors from distraction are not influenced by sensory noise at encoding

Holly Kular, John T. Serences
Journal of Vision
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Working memory errors from distraction are not influenced by sensory noise at encoding

Holly Kular, John T. Serences
article en

Abstract

Prior research suggests that ongoing sensory input during the delay period of a visual working memory task interferes with the storage of remembered information. However, it is unclear whether sensory uncertainty during encoding increases susceptibility to interference or whether memories are relatively stable once information is encoded (even if encoding is highly inaccurate). Here, we tested whether distracting stimuli influenced memory accuracy while simultaneously manipulating sensory noise by changing the width of a bandpass filter applied to white noise stimuli to titrate the amount of orientation information in each remembered stimulus. In a behavioral experiment (N=24), participants viewed a phase-reversing orientation grating rendered at one of two levels of sensory noise (high and low) for 500 ms, followed by a 3,000 ms delay with one of three distractor conditions (no distractor, ignore oriented white noise distractor, or attend oriented white noise distractor). At the end of each trial subjects responded by rotating a white line to match the remembered orientation. We found strong evidence that increasing noise in the remembered oriented grating decreased working memory performance (BF10=3.49e12). Notably, the presence of oriented distractors interfered with working memory performance (BF10=72.2), with evidence of memory attraction toward the orientation of the noise distractor. However, there was no interaction between stimulus noise and distractor presence (BF10=0.13). These data provide evidence that while working memory representations are prone to adaptive distortions during delay periods, these distortions are not modulated by sensory noise during encoding.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of California San Diego (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.