Object correspondence across movements at saccadic speed

Saccadic eye movements impose rapid motion on the retinal image, raising the question of how object correspondence is established from one fixation to the next. Here, we investigated if the rapid motion itself — by providing spatiotemporal continuity — plays a role in achieving object correspondence. To isolate the contribution of high-speed motion, we simulated saccadic motion using a high-temporal-resolution projector (updating the display every 0.69 ms) while observers fixated their gaze throughout the experiments. We first investigated the contribution of motion at saccadic speed to object correspondence using a two-frame quartet-motion display. We positioned identical Gabor patches as objects at opposing corners within an imaginary rectangle. One object then moved continuously — along a curved trajectory (inward or outward) — to one of the neighboring corners, while the other jumped to the opposite side, completing the quartet. On each trial, participants first reported quartet rotations (clockwise or counterclockwise), indicating perceived object correspondence, and then traced the perceived continuous motion trajectory using a mouse, indicating motion visibility (location and curvature). We found that motion visibility declined as speed increased, eventually reaching chance levels for location and curvature reports. At the same time, continuous motion biased the quartet rotation perception even at the highest (saccade-like) speeds. These results suggest that high-speed motion informs object correspondence, even if that motion is effectively invisible. We are currently following up on this finding in a second study, in which we combine a version of our quartet motion display with the go/no-go reviewing paradigm (Sasi et al., 2023). We investigate if object files are maintained through motion at saccadic speed. By combining objective measures of stimulus visibility, the perception of object correspondence, and the maintenance of object files over time, we aim to shed light on the fundamental mechanisms behind object continuity at saccadic speeds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1177
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Object correspondence across movements at saccadic speed

Melis İnce, Martin Rolfs, Carolin Hübner
1 citations
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
0.34
article

Object correspondence across movements at saccadic speed

Melis İnce, Martin Rolfs, Carolin Hübner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements impose rapid motion on the retinal image, raising the question of how object correspondence is established from one fixation to the next. Here, we investigated if the rapid motion itself — by providing spatiotemporal continuity — plays a role in achieving object correspondence. To isolate the contribution of high-speed motion, we simulated saccadic motion using a high-temporal-resolution projector (updating the display every 0.69 ms) while observers fixated their gaze throughout the experiments. We first investigated the contribution of motion at saccadic speed to object correspondence using a two-frame quartet-motion display. We positioned identical Gabor patches as objects at opposing corners within an imaginary rectangle. One object then moved continuously — along a curved trajectory (inward or outward) — to one of the neighboring corners, while the other jumped to the opposite side, completing the quartet. On each trial, participants first reported quartet rotations (clockwise or counterclockwise), indicating perceived object correspondence, and then traced the perceived continuous motion trajectory using a mouse, indicating motion visibility (location and curvature). We found that motion visibility declined as speed increased, eventually reaching chance levels for location and curvature reports. At the same time, continuous motion biased the quartet rotation perception even at the highest (saccade-like) speeds. These results suggest that high-speed motion informs object correspondence, even if that motion is effectively invisible. We are currently following up on this finding in a second study, in which we combine a version of our quartet motion display with the go/no-go reviewing paradigm (Sasi et al., 2023). We investigate if object files are maintained through motion at saccadic speed. By combining objective measures of stimulus visibility, the perception of object correspondence, and the maintenance of object files over time, we aim to shed light on the fundamental mechanisms behind object continuity at saccadic speeds.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Chemnitz University of Technology (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.