Beyond Distraction: Exploring the Conditions of Task-Irrelevant Feature Reinstatement and Working Memory-Based Capture during Visual Search

Objects actively stored in visual working memory (VWM) for a recall task, produce VWM-based attentional capture. However, capture often only occurs for the object’s task relevant features. For example, when shown a red circle and asked to later report its shape, in an intervening singleton-search task, circle distractors (task-relevant feature) preferentially capture attention, and red distractors (task-irrelevant feature) do not. Interestingly, for an object’s features to be stored in VWM, they do not need to be shown, but can also be reinstated from long-term memory (LTM); for example, if the shape was previously associated with a colour. Unlike shown features, reinstated features in VWM appear to preferentially capture attention even when task irrelevant. To investigate this difference, we examined how capture by reinstated features is influenced by memory goal (remember vs. search), and search goal (singleton vs. object). Participants memorized a set of objects with specific colours, and then completed a dual task in which they were instructed to either remember or search for one of the objects’ shapes in any colour. On each trial, one memorized object was brought into VWM, and participants had to complete a shape-singleton search task followed by either an object recall, or an object search task. We found that, regardless of whether participants were instructed to remember or search for the object shape, the irrelevant reinstated colour did not capture attention more than any other colour in the shape-singleton search task. However, in both object tasks, participants were quicker to locate and report the object when it appeared in the irrelevant memorized colour. These results suggest that under both remember and search conditions, the task-irrelevant feature was reinstated, actively maintained in VWM, and could bias attention. But merely actively maintaining the irrelevant reinstated feature did not mean it always captured attention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1142
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Distraction: Exploring the Conditions of Task-Irrelevant Feature Reinstatement and Working Memory-Based Capture during Visual Search

Naseem Al-Aidroos, Jessica Kespe, Rory Lippert
Journal of Vision
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

Beyond Distraction: Exploring the Conditions of Task-Irrelevant Feature Reinstatement and Working Memory-Based Capture during Visual Search

Naseem Al-Aidroos, Jessica Kespe, Rory Lippert
article en

Abstract

Objects actively stored in visual working memory (VWM) for a recall task, produce VWM-based attentional capture. However, capture often only occurs for the object’s task relevant features. For example, when shown a red circle and asked to later report its shape, in an intervening singleton-search task, circle distractors (task-relevant feature) preferentially capture attention, and red distractors (task-irrelevant feature) do not. Interestingly, for an object’s features to be stored in VWM, they do not need to be shown, but can also be reinstated from long-term memory (LTM); for example, if the shape was previously associated with a colour. Unlike shown features, reinstated features in VWM appear to preferentially capture attention even when task irrelevant. To investigate this difference, we examined how capture by reinstated features is influenced by memory goal (remember vs. search), and search goal (singleton vs. object). Participants memorized a set of objects with specific colours, and then completed a dual task in which they were instructed to either remember or search for one of the objects’ shapes in any colour. On each trial, one memorized object was brought into VWM, and participants had to complete a shape-singleton search task followed by either an object recall, or an object search task. We found that, regardless of whether participants were instructed to remember or search for the object shape, the irrelevant reinstated colour did not capture attention more than any other colour in the shape-singleton search task. However, in both object tasks, participants were quicker to locate and report the object when it appeared in the irrelevant memorized colour. These results suggest that under both remember and search conditions, the task-irrelevant feature was reinstated, actively maintained in VWM, and could bias attention. But merely actively maintaining the irrelevant reinstated feature did not mean it always captured attention.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Guelph (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.