Ugly colours: Chromatic determinants of image aesthetic valence

Affective and aesthetic responses to images may be partly determined by spatiochromatic statistics, independently of semantic meaning or content (e.g. McAdams et al. 2023, J. Vis.). Such relationships are generally explored through positive rather than negative responses – e.g. liking or beauty ratings, not disliking or ugliness. Here we examine the extent to which chromatic properties alone may predict both perceived beauty and ugliness, in photographs. We further examine whether differences in colour distributions between beautiful and ugly photographs are predictable from abstract colour preferences; in Western culture, people of both sexes and different ages tend to prefer colours with cooler hues and higher saturation and lightness and to dislike dark yellow hues (browns). Methods: In an online experiment, 94 participants (94% of which were aged 16-25 years) each submitted four recently taken photographs, two that they considered ugly and two beautiful, with an indoor and outdoor scene for each aesthetic category. Photographs were restricted to scenes without people or other animate objects. In a subsidiary online experiment, 6 new participants independently ranked hue salience in each submitted image. Results: Analysis of the image statistics showed that across both scene types, colourfulness was significantly higher for beautiful vs. ugly pictures, and for outdoor images only, mean image chroma was significantly higher for beautiful pictures. Hue distributions - whether obtained by an automated colour category classification algorithm or from the independent human ratings - also differed between beautiful and ugly pictures. In outdoor pictures, the proportion of “blue” was significantly lower and “brown” and “grey” significantly higher in ugly vs. beautiful categories. The results suggest that aesthetic responses to pictures are partially predicted by affective responses to colour, both positive and negative. The results further suggest that perception of ugliness is not merely the opposite of beauty, but a distinct process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1230
Primary Topic
Color perception and design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ugly colours: Chromatic determinants of image aesthetic valence

Alejandro Pàrraga, Fatima M. Felisberti, Jan Kučera, Anya Hurlbert et al.
Journal of Vision
Color perception and design
article

Ugly colours: Chromatic determinants of image aesthetic valence

Alejandro Pàrraga, Fatima M. Felisberti, Jan Kučera, Anya Hurlbert, Dalya Al-Shahrabi
article en

Abstract

Affective and aesthetic responses to images may be partly determined by spatiochromatic statistics, independently of semantic meaning or content (e.g. McAdams et al. 2023, J. Vis.). Such relationships are generally explored through positive rather than negative responses – e.g. liking or beauty ratings, not disliking or ugliness. Here we examine the extent to which chromatic properties alone may predict both perceived beauty and ugliness, in photographs. We further examine whether differences in colour distributions between beautiful and ugly photographs are predictable from abstract colour preferences; in Western culture, people of both sexes and different ages tend to prefer colours with cooler hues and higher saturation and lightness and to dislike dark yellow hues (browns). Methods: In an online experiment, 94 participants (94% of which were aged 16-25 years) each submitted four recently taken photographs, two that they considered ugly and two beautiful, with an indoor and outdoor scene for each aesthetic category. Photographs were restricted to scenes without people or other animate objects. In a subsidiary online experiment, 6 new participants independently ranked hue salience in each submitted image. Results: Analysis of the image statistics showed that across both scene types, colourfulness was significantly higher for beautiful vs. ugly pictures, and for outdoor images only, mean image chroma was significantly higher for beautiful pictures. Hue distributions - whether obtained by an automated colour category classification algorithm or from the independent human ratings - also differed between beautiful and ugly pictures. In outdoor pictures, the proportion of “blue” was significantly lower and “brown” and “grey” significantly higher in ugly vs. beautiful categories. The results suggest that aesthetic responses to pictures are partially predicted by affective responses to colour, both positive and negative. The results further suggest that perception of ugliness is not merely the opposite of beauty, but a distinct process.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Northumbria University (GB), Kingston University (US), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Color perception and design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.