Can we predict vividness from the characteristics of imagined images? A novel database featuring vividness judgments of the Natural Scene Dataset

What makes an image easy to imagine? Previous research on mental imagery mostly used very limited samples, which prevented establishing a direct association between image characteristics and vividness ratings (i.e., the clarity and detail level of imagined images). Here, we present a large-scale database of vividness judgments associated with the natural scenes from the Natural Scenes Dataset (NSD; Allen et al., 2021), which consists of 73,000 annotated natural images. During each trial, participants sequentially view two NSD images and are then randomly asked to imagine one or the other (i.e., retro-cued target image) for 4 s. Participants then rate the vividness of their mental image (on a continuous scale from 0 to 100), followed by a test to ensure that they imagined the correct target. Participants (n = 1825), recruited from Prolific, are directed to the Meadows platform for online experiments. Each complete 120 trials of our vividness task, for a total of 219,000 vividness ratings across participants. They also complete the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (Marks, 1973) to measure their visual imagery ability. Overall, preliminary data reveals excellent performance on the task (average accuracy of 95.83% correct target identification), as well as substantial interimage (M = 0.65 ± 0.25) and interindividual (M = 0.66 ± 0.17) variability in average vividness scores. This large-scale dataset of vividness ratings will offer invaluable insights into visual imagery by allowing to train predictive models of subjective imagery experiences. It will enable a deeper understanding of the visual and cognitive factors influencing mental image vividness, and serve as a guiding resource for future experiments. Furthermore, integrating these vividness judgments with neural data from the NSD will allow for an exploration of the relationship between subjective experience and objective brain responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1235
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can we predict vividness from the characteristics of imagined images? A novel database featuring vividness judgments of the Natural Scene Dataset

Catherine Landry, Vincent Taschereau‐Dumouchel, Frédéric Gosselin, Ian Charest et al.
Journal of Vision
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Can we predict vividness from the characteristics of imagined images? A novel database featuring vividness judgments of the Natural Scene Dataset

Catherine Landry, Vincent Taschereau‐Dumouchel, Frédéric Gosselin, Ian Charest, Jasper JF van den Bosch
article en

Abstract

What makes an image easy to imagine? Previous research on mental imagery mostly used very limited samples, which prevented establishing a direct association between image characteristics and vividness ratings (i.e., the clarity and detail level of imagined images). Here, we present a large-scale database of vividness judgments associated with the natural scenes from the Natural Scenes Dataset (NSD; Allen et al., 2021), which consists of 73,000 annotated natural images. During each trial, participants sequentially view two NSD images and are then randomly asked to imagine one or the other (i.e., retro-cued target image) for 4 s. Participants then rate the vividness of their mental image (on a continuous scale from 0 to 100), followed by a test to ensure that they imagined the correct target. Participants (n = 1825), recruited from Prolific, are directed to the Meadows platform for online experiments. Each complete 120 trials of our vividness task, for a total of 219,000 vividness ratings across participants. They also complete the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (Marks, 1973) to measure their visual imagery ability. Overall, preliminary data reveals excellent performance on the task (average accuracy of 95.83% correct target identification), as well as substantial interimage (M = 0.65 ± 0.25) and interindividual (M = 0.66 ± 0.17) variability in average vividness scores. This large-scale dataset of vividness ratings will offer invaluable insights into visual imagery by allowing to train predictive models of subjective imagery experiences. It will enable a deeper understanding of the visual and cognitive factors influencing mental image vividness, and serve as a guiding resource for future experiments. Furthermore, integrating these vividness judgments with neural data from the NSD will allow for an exploration of the relationship between subjective experience and objective brain responses.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Leeds (GB), Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec (CA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.