Diverse visual feature selectivity is enabled through inhibitory feature surrounds in deep neural network models

Artificial neural networks are proving useful for understanding hierarchical visual processing, as we gain direct access to all of a model’s internal workings, including not only the activation of every unit, but also the weights connecting these units. A new frontier of ‘mechanistic interpretability’ has emerged in machine learning, which seeks to understand not only what features are represented by the network, but how complex features are built from simpler ones through these connections. As in biological visual research, these approaches start by identifying interpretable features in the latent layers based on maximally activating images, such as ‘edge-detectors’, ‘curve-detectors, ‘object-parts’ etc. Considering the weights between layers then yields a compositional explanation of feature construction —e.g. a rabbit detector is built from legs, ears and eye detectors; an eye from curves, a curve from line segments, etc. However, here we argue this ‘composition-by-parts’ account is fundamentally incomplete, because it fails to incorporate the role of inhibitory operations. Negative weights constitute half of the learned weights in a typical deep neural network. Where inhibition is conventionally treated as analogous to excitation —for example, by considering maximally inhibiting images — we show that the asymmetry introduced by the non-linear activation function (ReLU) necessitates distinct computational roles for excitation and inhibition. We put forward a theory of the ‘inhibitory feature surround’, in which inhibition enables the construction of diverse features with selective excitatory responses. We validate our account with a series of ‘virtual lesioning’ experiments on inhibitory connections. Lastly, we introduce a feature visualization technique designed to target a feature’s inhibitory surround specifically, to help researchers understand the role of inhibition in particular cases. Broadly, these results provide clarity into the functional role of inhibition in deep neural network models, and offer a framework for empirical tests of inhibitory function in biological visual systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1192
Primary Topic
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diverse visual feature selectivity is enabled through inhibitory feature surrounds in deep neural network models

Talia Konkle, George A. Alvarez, C. Hamblin
Journal of Vision
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
article

Diverse visual feature selectivity is enabled through inhibitory feature surrounds in deep neural network models

Talia Konkle, George A. Alvarez, C. Hamblin
article en

Abstract

Artificial neural networks are proving useful for understanding hierarchical visual processing, as we gain direct access to all of a model’s internal workings, including not only the activation of every unit, but also the weights connecting these units. A new frontier of ‘mechanistic interpretability’ has emerged in machine learning, which seeks to understand not only what features are represented by the network, but how complex features are built from simpler ones through these connections. As in biological visual research, these approaches start by identifying interpretable features in the latent layers based on maximally activating images, such as ‘edge-detectors’, ‘curve-detectors, ‘object-parts’ etc. Considering the weights between layers then yields a compositional explanation of feature construction —e.g. a rabbit detector is built from legs, ears and eye detectors; an eye from curves, a curve from line segments, etc. However, here we argue this ‘composition-by-parts’ account is fundamentally incomplete, because it fails to incorporate the role of inhibitory operations. Negative weights constitute half of the learned weights in a typical deep neural network. Where inhibition is conventionally treated as analogous to excitation —for example, by considering maximally inhibiting images — we show that the asymmetry introduced by the non-linear activation function (ReLU) necessitates distinct computational roles for excitation and inhibition. We put forward a theory of the ‘inhibitory feature surround’, in which inhibition enables the construction of diverse features with selective excitatory responses. We validate our account with a series of ‘virtual lesioning’ experiments on inhibitory connections. Lastly, we introduce a feature visualization technique designed to target a feature’s inhibitory surround specifically, to help researchers understand the role of inhibition in particular cases. Broadly, these results provide clarity into the functional role of inhibition in deep neural network models, and offer a framework for empirical tests of inhibitory function in biological visual systems.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Harvard University Press (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.