Intertext: How Do Readers Perceive National and Universal Precedents?

The article examines the national and universal level of precedent phenomena, which are one of the forms of creating intertexts. Our goal is to show which type of levels is most quickly determined by the reader. To achieve this goal, 36 respondents participated in the research work and six precedent phenomena were obtained: 3 national, 3 universal. The questions related to precedent names were composed according to words formed by metaphor, metonymy, comparison, paraphrase. The respondents' responses were analyzed using a "one-sample t-test" in the Jamovi system. The results of the study showed that universal levels are more recognizable by the reader (Univ1=4.75; Nat1=3.37; Univ2=5.99; Nat2=5.93; Univ3=4.06; Nat3=4.51). That is, statistically, the predominance was the preservation of universal concepts in the reader's mind. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of precedent, which is a type of intertext.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forum for Linguistic Studies
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6850
Primary Topic
Themes in Literature Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intertext: How Do Readers Perceive National and Universal Precedents?

Aiman Kelmaganbetova, Nurgul Nygmetova, Baglan Kaukerbekova, Kalamkas Kalybekova et al.
Forum for Linguistic Studies
Themes in Literature Analysis
article

Intertext: How Do Readers Perceive National and Universal Precedents?

Aiman Kelmaganbetova, Nurgul Nygmetova, Baglan Kaukerbekova, Kalamkas Kalybekova, Karlygash Hamzina
article en

Abstract

The article examines the national and universal level of precedent phenomena, which are one of the forms of creating intertexts. Our goal is to show which type of levels is most quickly determined by the reader. To achieve this goal, 36 respondents participated in the research work and six precedent phenomena were obtained: 3 national, 3 universal. The questions related to precedent names were composed according to words formed by metaphor, metonymy, comparison, paraphrase. The respondents' responses were analyzed using a "one-sample t-test" in the Jamovi system. The results of the study showed that universal levels are more recognizable by the reader (Univ1=4.75; Nat1=3.37; Univ2=5.99; Nat2=5.93; Univ3=4.06; Nat3=4.51). That is, statistically, the predominance was the preservation of universal concepts in the reader's mind. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of precedent, which is a type of intertext.

Forum for Linguistic StudiesVol. 6(4)
Karaganda Medical University (KZ), Abylkas Saginov Karaganda Technical University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Themes in Literature Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intertext: How Do Readers Perceive National and Universal Precedents? — Aiman Kelmaganbetova, Nurgul Nygmetova, et al. · Forum for Linguistic Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS