In-situ prediction of soil organic carbon contents in wheat-rice rotation fields via visible near-infrared spectroscopy

Visible near-infrared (VNIR) spectroscopy is a reliable method for estimating soil properties. However, its effectiveness in accurately predicting soil organic carbon (SOC) contents, particularly in wheat-rice rotation fields, remains uncertain. In this study, we collected 202 samples from wheat-rice fields (0–20 ​cm) in southeastern China and measured in-situ spectra of the vertical surface of the soil cores and the laboratory spectra of the dried and sieved soil samples. Our study focused on evaluating three algorithms - external parameter orthogonalization (EPO), direct standardization (DS), and piecewise direct standardization (PDS) - to address the influence of external factors, particularly soil moisture. To carry out our analysis, the dataset was divided into calibration (141 samples) and validation (61 samples) sets via the Kennard-Stone algorithm. A subset of the corresponding in-situ and laboratory spectra in the calibration set (transfer set) was used to derive the transfer matrix for EPO, DS, and PDS, enabling the conversion of in-situ spectra to laboratory spectra by characterizing their differences. Four machine learning models, including cubist, partial least squares regression (PLSR), random forest (RF), and memory-based learning (MBL), were used to predict the SOC, particulate organic carbon (POC), and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) contents based on the laboratory, in-situ , and corrected in-situ spectra. The results revealed that the laboratory spectra outperformed the non-corrected in-situ spectra, with coefficients of determination (R 2 ) of 0.91, 0.75, and 0.80 for SOC, POC, and MAOC, respectively. Among the models, MBL and PLSR exhibited the highest average R 2 at 0.85–0.86. EPO marginally improved the prediction accuracy (R 2 increased from 0.85 to 0.87 for SOC, 0.64 to 0.69 for POC, and 0.75 to 0.82 for MAOC). These promising prediction accuracies underscore the potential of VNIR spectra for in-situ predictions in wheat-rice fields in Southeast China, offering insights for predicting SOC contents via in-situ spectroscopy. • The MBL model exhibited the highest accuracy in predicting SOC, POC, and MAOC. • Laboratory and in-situ spectra can more accurately predict MAOC than POC. • EPO algorithm can marginally enhance the predictions of SOC, POC, and MAOC. • During low soil moisture periods, in-situ spectra can effectively predict SOC and its fractions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil & Environmental Health
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seh.2024.100113
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-situ prediction of soil organic carbon contents in wheat-rice rotation fields via visible near-infrared spectroscopy

Qiangyi Yu, Jie Xue, Songchao Chen, Rui Lu et al.
13 citations
Soil & Environmental Health
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
2.67
article

In-situ prediction of soil organic carbon contents in wheat-rice rotation fields via visible near-infrared spectroscopy

Qiangyi Yu, Jie Xue, Songchao Chen, Rui Lu, Zhongxing Chen, Lingju Dai, Zhou Shi, Zheng Wang
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Visible near-infrared (VNIR) spectroscopy is a reliable method for estimating soil properties. However, its effectiveness in accurately predicting soil organic carbon (SOC) contents, particularly in wheat-rice rotation fields, remains uncertain. In this study, we collected 202 samples from wheat-rice fields (0–20 ​cm) in southeastern China and measured in-situ spectra of the vertical surface of the soil cores and the laboratory spectra of the dried and sieved soil samples. Our study focused on evaluating three algorithms - external parameter orthogonalization (EPO), direct standardization (DS), and piecewise direct standardization (PDS) - to address the influence of external factors, particularly soil moisture. To carry out our analysis, the dataset was divided into calibration (141 samples) and validation (61 samples) sets via the Kennard-Stone algorithm. A subset of the corresponding in-situ and laboratory spectra in the calibration set (transfer set) was used to derive the transfer matrix for EPO, DS, and PDS, enabling the conversion of in-situ spectra to laboratory spectra by characterizing their differences. Four machine learning models, including cubist, partial least squares regression (PLSR), random forest (RF), and memory-based learning (MBL), were used to predict the SOC, particulate organic carbon (POC), and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) contents based on the laboratory, in-situ , and corrected in-situ spectra. The results revealed that the laboratory spectra outperformed the non-corrected in-situ spectra, with coefficients of determination (R 2 ) of 0.91, 0.75, and 0.80 for SOC, POC, and MAOC, respectively. Among the models, MBL and PLSR exhibited the highest average R 2 at 0.85–0.86. EPO marginally improved the prediction accuracy (R 2 increased from 0.85 to 0.87 for SOC, 0.64 to 0.69 for POC, and 0.75 to 0.82 for MAOC). These promising prediction accuracies underscore the potential of VNIR spectra for in-situ predictions in wheat-rice fields in Southeast China, offering insights for predicting SOC contents via in-situ spectroscopy. • The MBL model exhibited the highest accuracy in predicting SOC, POC, and MAOC. • Laboratory and in-situ spectra can more accurately predict MAOC than POC. • EPO algorithm can marginally enhance the predictions of SOC, POC, and MAOC. • During low soil moisture periods, in-situ spectra can effectively predict SOC and its fractions.

Soil & Environmental HealthVol. 2(4)
Zhejiang University of Science and Technology (CN), Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
2.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.