Methodological Tutorial Series for Epidemiological Studies: When and How to Split the Follow-up Time in the Analysis of Epidemiological or Clinical Studies With Follow-ups

In epidemiological or clinical studies with follow-ups, data tables generated and processed for statistical analysis are often of the "wide-format" type, consisting of one row per individual. However, depending on the situation and purpose of the study, they may need to be transformed into the "long-format" type, which allows for multiple rows per individual. This tutorial clarifies the typical situations wherein researchers are recommended to split follow-up times to generate long-format data tables. In such applications, the major analytical aims consist of (i) estimating the outcome incidence rates or their ratios between ≥2 groups, according to specific follow-up time periods; (ii) examining the interaction between the exposure status and follow-up time to assess the proportional hazards assumption in Cox models; (iii) dealing with time-varying exposures for descriptive or predictive purposes; (iv) estimating the causal effects of time-varying exposures while adjusting for time-varying confounders that may be affected by past exposures; and (v) comparing different time periods within the same individual in self-controlled case-series analyses. This tutorial also discusses how to split follow-up times according to their purposes in practical settings, providing example codes in Stata, R, and SAS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.je20240245
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological Tutorial Series for Epidemiological Studies: When and How to Split the Follow-up Time in the Analysis of Epidemiological or Clinical Studies With Follow-ups

Yoshinori Takeuchi, Tomohiro Shinozaki, Miho Ishimaru, Masao Iwagami
4 citations
Journal of Epidemiology
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.84
article

Methodological Tutorial Series for Epidemiological Studies: When and How to Split the Follow-up Time in the Analysis of Epidemiological or Clinical Studies With Follow-ups

Yoshinori Takeuchi, Tomohiro Shinozaki, Miho Ishimaru, Masao Iwagami
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In epidemiological or clinical studies with follow-ups, data tables generated and processed for statistical analysis are often of the "wide-format" type, consisting of one row per individual. However, depending on the situation and purpose of the study, they may need to be transformed into the "long-format" type, which allows for multiple rows per individual. This tutorial clarifies the typical situations wherein researchers are recommended to split follow-up times to generate long-format data tables. In such applications, the major analytical aims consist of (i) estimating the outcome incidence rates or their ratios between ≥2 groups, according to specific follow-up time periods; (ii) examining the interaction between the exposure status and follow-up time to assess the proportional hazards assumption in Cox models; (iii) dealing with time-varying exposures for descriptive or predictive purposes; (iv) estimating the causal effects of time-varying exposures while adjusting for time-varying confounders that may be affected by past exposures; and (v) comparing different time periods within the same individual in self-controlled case-series analyses. This tutorial also discusses how to split follow-up times according to their purposes in practical settings, providing example codes in Stata, R, and SAS.

Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 35(4)
University of London (GB), Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP), University of Tsukuba (JP), Tokyo University of Science (JP), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Institute of Science Tokyo (JP), Yokohama City University (JP), Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (JP), Tsukuba International University (JP)
University of Tokyo
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.