Advancing the reporting of pediatric EEG data: Tools for estimating reliability, effect size, and data quality metrics

EEG studies play a crucial role in enhancing our understanding of brain development across the lifespan. The increasing clinical and policy implications of EEG research underscore the importance of utilizing reliable EEG measures and increasing the reproducibility of EEG studies. However, important data characteristics like reliability, effect sizes, and data quality metrics are often underreported in pediatric EEG studies. This gap in reporting could stem from the lack of accessible computational tools for quantifying these metrics for EEG data. To help address the lack of reporting, we developed a toolbox that facilitates the estimation of internal consistency reliability, effect size, and standardized measurement error with user-friendly software that facilitates both computing and interpreting these measures. In addition, our tool provides subsampled reliability and effect size in increasing numbers of trials. These estimates offer insights into the number of trials needed for detecting significant effects and reliable measures, informing the minimum number of trial thresholds for the inclusion of participants in individual difference analyses and the optimal trial number for future study designs. Importantly, our toolbox is integrated into commonly used preprocessing pipelines to increase the estimation and reporting of data quality metrics in developmental neuroscience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101458
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing the reporting of pediatric EEG data: Tools for estimating reliability, effect size, and data quality metrics

Michal R. Zieff, Santiago Morales, Ana Pina Sobrino, Laurel J. Gabard‐Durnam et al.
8 citations
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
3.22
article

Advancing the reporting of pediatric EEG data: Tools for estimating reliability, effect size, and data quality metrics

Michal R. Zieff, Santiago Morales, Ana Pina Sobrino, Laurel J. Gabard‐Durnam, Sarah A. McCormick, Kirsten A. Donald, A.D. Monachino, Emma T. Margolis, Lauren Davel, Wenyi Xu, Cara Bosco, Cassandra J Franke
article en
8 citations

Abstract

EEG studies play a crucial role in enhancing our understanding of brain development across the lifespan. The increasing clinical and policy implications of EEG research underscore the importance of utilizing reliable EEG measures and increasing the reproducibility of EEG studies. However, important data characteristics like reliability, effect sizes, and data quality metrics are often underreported in pediatric EEG studies. This gap in reporting could stem from the lack of accessible computational tools for quantifying these metrics for EEG data. To help address the lack of reporting, we developed a toolbox that facilitates the estimation of internal consistency reliability, effect size, and standardized measurement error with user-friendly software that facilitates both computing and interpreting these measures. In addition, our tool provides subsampled reliability and effect size in increasing numbers of trials. These estimates offer insights into the number of trials needed for detecting significant effects and reliable measures, informing the minimum number of trial thresholds for the inclusion of participants in individual difference analyses and the optimal trial number for future study designs. Importantly, our toolbox is integrated into commonly used preprocessing pipelines to increase the estimation and reporting of data quality metrics in developmental neuroscience.

Developmental Cognitive NeuroscienceVol. 70
University of Southern California (US), Northeastern University (US)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.