A food waste information-framing can help promote purchase of suboptimal potatoes

• Participants’ willingness to choose suboptimal potatoes increased with food waste messages. • The effect was found despite both potatoes being equally expensive. • Reasons for choosing the suboptimal potato included the reduction of food waste. • Reasons for choosing the optimal potato included product price and aesthetics. Following specifications focusing on aesthetics, huge quantities of produce are discarded along the food value chain even before reaching the supermarket. One example is fresh potatoes, where only around 50% of the potatoes produced reach the consumer. In this study, we used an online study (N = 481, 51% women) to investigate whether food waste information-framing can make suboptimal potatoes more appealing to consumers. In the experimental part, we used a 2 × 2 design (setting × information). Participants were presented with either a supermarket or farm shop setting with or without food waste information. They chose between optimal potato A, suboptimal potato B, or neither. Both potatoes were equally expensive. We found that the participants’ willingness to choose suboptimal potatoes increased significantly with food waste messages (25% to 41% and 29% to 46%, respectively). Our results show that the provision of food waste information-framing can help promote suboptimal potatoes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105338
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A food waste information-framing can help promote purchase of suboptimal potatoes

Jeanine Ammann, Gabriele Mack, Carole Liechti, Rita Saleh
9 citations
Food Quality and Preference
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
3.14
article

A food waste information-framing can help promote purchase of suboptimal potatoes

Jeanine Ammann, Gabriele Mack, Carole Liechti, Rita Saleh
article en
9 citations

Abstract

• Participants’ willingness to choose suboptimal potatoes increased with food waste messages. • The effect was found despite both potatoes being equally expensive. • Reasons for choosing the suboptimal potato included the reduction of food waste. • Reasons for choosing the optimal potato included product price and aesthetics. Following specifications focusing on aesthetics, huge quantities of produce are discarded along the food value chain even before reaching the supermarket. One example is fresh potatoes, where only around 50% of the potatoes produced reach the consumer. In this study, we used an online study (N = 481, 51% women) to investigate whether food waste information-framing can make suboptimal potatoes more appealing to consumers. In the experimental part, we used a 2 × 2 design (setting × information). Participants were presented with either a supermarket or farm shop setting with or without food waste information. They chose between optimal potato A, suboptimal potato B, or neither. Both potatoes were equally expensive. We found that the participants’ willingness to choose suboptimal potatoes increased significantly with food waste messages (25% to 41% and 29% to 46%, respectively). Our results show that the provision of food waste information-framing can help promote suboptimal potatoes.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 123
Agroscope (CH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
3.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.