Towards a ‘single-minded’ social science that matters

Social science is not as it should be – I think we have lost contact with what matters. Many scholars have made similar laments and directed their attention at disciplines in an attempt to mark out a more virtuous and effective future. Such attempts are valuable, but in taking aim at this disciplinary level they miss two important features of academic life. That is, while the social sciences are clearly more than the sum of their parts, they are still made up of parts – you, I, us, and other ‘rank and file’ academics. And that although our disciplines are multifarious, there are common features that sit at the core of all good social science. By focusing at these two levels, I outline the objective ethical and moral foundations from which we can each enhance our ability to produce free-thinking and free-wheeling but still rigorous research in socially progressive directions towards foundationally similar, if various, ends – a ‘single-minded’ social science that matters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03459-7
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a ‘single-minded’ social science that matters

Christopher R. Matthews
3 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
3.40
article

Towards a ‘single-minded’ social science that matters

Christopher R. Matthews
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Social science is not as it should be – I think we have lost contact with what matters. Many scholars have made similar laments and directed their attention at disciplines in an attempt to mark out a more virtuous and effective future. Such attempts are valuable, but in taking aim at this disciplinary level they miss two important features of academic life. That is, while the social sciences are clearly more than the sum of their parts, they are still made up of parts – you, I, us, and other ‘rank and file’ academics. And that although our disciplines are multifarious, there are common features that sit at the core of all good social science. By focusing at these two levels, I outline the objective ethical and moral foundations from which we can each enhance our ability to produce free-thinking and free-wheeling but still rigorous research in socially progressive directions towards foundationally similar, if various, ends – a ‘single-minded’ social science that matters.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 11(1)
Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.