Geopolymer-hydroxyapatite composite foams for wastewater remediation

Two types of monolithic geopolymer-hydroxyapatite (HA) foams, different in terms of porosity, were produced by direct foaming through the addition of metallic silicon as blowing agent. The ability of the geopolymer to bind HA allowed an easy shaping and consolidation of the material. The total porosity of the two foams ranged from 72 to 87 % with similar surface areas (26–27 m 2 g −1 ) despite different HA content (27 and 21 wt% respectively). Composite foams were compared with the pure geopolymer matrix assessing the surface electrostatic characteristics and testing methylene blue (MB) removal at pH = 7. At long times (24h) the best performing monolithic foam reached a removal efficiency of 76 % and 69 % respectively in 10 ppm and 50 ppm MB solution, while granulated foams reached an efficiency of 85 %. The best experimental data fit with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model indicating the chemisorption of MB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ceramics International
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.09.383
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Chemical Synthesis and Characterization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopolymer-hydroxyapatite composite foams for wastewater remediation

Valentina Medri, Elettra Papa, Elena Landi
11 citations
Ceramics International
Chemical Synthesis and Characterization
3.23
article

Geopolymer-hydroxyapatite composite foams for wastewater remediation

Valentina Medri, Elettra Papa, Elena Landi
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Two types of monolithic geopolymer-hydroxyapatite (HA) foams, different in terms of porosity, were produced by direct foaming through the addition of metallic silicon as blowing agent. The ability of the geopolymer to bind HA allowed an easy shaping and consolidation of the material. The total porosity of the two foams ranged from 72 to 87 % with similar surface areas (26–27 m 2 g −1 ) despite different HA content (27 and 21 wt% respectively). Composite foams were compared with the pure geopolymer matrix assessing the surface electrostatic characteristics and testing methylene blue (MB) removal at pH = 7. At long times (24h) the best performing monolithic foam reached a removal efficiency of 76 % and 69 % respectively in 10 ppm and 50 ppm MB solution, while granulated foams reached an efficiency of 85 %. The best experimental data fit with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model indicating the chemisorption of MB.

Ceramics InternationalVol. 50(23)
Institute of Science and Technology for Ceramics (IT)
Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Chemical Synthesis and Characterization
3.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.