William Bateson, black slavery, eugenics and speciation: The relative roles of politics and science

The peace of the world is challenged by societal confrontations that can often be labeled “racial” or “ethnic.” Emblematic of this is discrimination based on skin colour. William Bateson's background suggests sympathy with the black emancipation movement. Yet the movement's success is attributed more to battles between political figures than between scientists with contending views on the biology of racial differences. However, in the long term, Bateson's contributions to slavery and eugenic issues may be seen as no less important than those of politicians. Mendel's discovery of what we now know as “genes” languished until seized upon by Bateson in 1900. For six exhausting years he struggled to win scientific acceptance of these biological character-determining units. Later, he pressed the Mendelian message home to the general public, opposing simplistic applications of Mendelian principles to human affairs, and arguing that minor genic differences that distinguished “races” – e.g. skin colour – do not initiate new species. Bateson praised the “physiological selection” speciation hypothesis of Darwin's young research associate, George Romanes. This enthusiasm was rekindled by Robert Lock and formulated in modern terms with C. R. Crowther. Thus, the spark that initiates a divergence into two species can be non-genic. This normal form of hybrid sterility, based on genome-wide DNA sequence differences, operates on, but has not succeeded in dividing, the human species. It should not be labeled “idiopathic,” and be clearly distinguished both from pathological sterility and undiagnosed sterilities that may prove to be pathological. We are one reproductively isolated population, the human species. • As With Steve Jobs, Bateson's science had immense political implications. • The underlying issues triggered both civil (19th century) and world (20th century) wars. • In 1900 Bateson brought Mendel's work in “genes” to world attention. • While genes control skin colour, they have not sparked new human species. • To this day, words like “mulatto” confuse our thinking on hybrid sterility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biosystems
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105348
Primary Topic
Race, Genetics, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

William Bateson, black slavery, eugenics and speciation: The relative roles of politics and science

Donald R. Forsdyke
Biosystems
Race, Genetics, and Society
article

William Bateson, black slavery, eugenics and speciation: The relative roles of politics and science

Donald R. Forsdyke
article en

Abstract

The peace of the world is challenged by societal confrontations that can often be labeled “racial” or “ethnic.” Emblematic of this is discrimination based on skin colour. William Bateson's background suggests sympathy with the black emancipation movement. Yet the movement's success is attributed more to battles between political figures than between scientists with contending views on the biology of racial differences. However, in the long term, Bateson's contributions to slavery and eugenic issues may be seen as no less important than those of politicians. Mendel's discovery of what we now know as “genes” languished until seized upon by Bateson in 1900. For six exhausting years he struggled to win scientific acceptance of these biological character-determining units. Later, he pressed the Mendelian message home to the general public, opposing simplistic applications of Mendelian principles to human affairs, and arguing that minor genic differences that distinguished “races” – e.g. skin colour – do not initiate new species. Bateson praised the “physiological selection” speciation hypothesis of Darwin's young research associate, George Romanes. This enthusiasm was rekindled by Robert Lock and formulated in modern terms with C. R. Crowther. Thus, the spark that initiates a divergence into two species can be non-genic. This normal form of hybrid sterility, based on genome-wide DNA sequence differences, operates on, but has not succeeded in dividing, the human species. It should not be labeled “idiopathic,” and be clearly distinguished both from pathological sterility and undiagnosed sterilities that may prove to be pathological. We are one reproductively isolated population, the human species. • As With Steve Jobs, Bateson's science had immense political implications. • The underlying issues triggered both civil (19th century) and world (20th century) wars. • In 1900 Bateson brought Mendel's work in “genes” to world attention. • While genes control skin colour, they have not sparked new human species. • To this day, words like “mulatto” confuse our thinking on hybrid sterility.

BiosystemsVol. 246
Queen's University (CA)
Royal Society
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Race, Genetics, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.