The performance of alternative GPS tracking devices: a case report on wild boars (Sus scrofa)

Abstract Background Telemetry studies on terrestrial mammals have been carried out almost exclusively using neck collar-mounted devices. However, collars are not suitable for all species and all age classes and may therefore compromise animal welfare and data quality requirements. Here, we evaluate the use of non-collar tracking devices on wild boars ( Sus scrofa ), a species for which collars may be problematic due to neck shape and seasonal body mass variation. We tested pelt-glued tags and three types of GPS ear tags. In addition, animals were marked with plain cattle ear tags. Results The tested GPS tags exhibited various technical challenges related mostly to satellite coverage of the study area and tag loss. However, GPS devices enabled moderate movement monitoring of weeks to months, whereas plain cattle ear tags offered information on displacement over longer time intervals. The longest direct dispersal distance (163 km) by a wild boar sounder was discovered by cattle tags. Conclusions Data volume and quality obtained from small tags are inferior to data provided by GPS collars, but low-fix rate tags may enable monitoring of individuals with reduced invasiveness. Moreover, these tags enable tracking in cases where the collar is not an option. The low price and small size of the devices together with technical developments may offer cost-effective tools for future studies on dispersal and survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Biotelemetry
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-024-00382-1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The performance of alternative GPS tracking devices: a case report on wild boars (Sus scrofa)

Markus Melin, Katja Holmala, Elmo Miettinen, Otso Huitu et al.
4 citations
Animal Biotelemetry
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.84
article

The performance of alternative GPS tracking devices: a case report on wild boars (Sus scrofa)

Markus Melin, Katja Holmala, Elmo Miettinen, Otso Huitu, Mervi Kunnasranta, Veli‐Matti Väänänen, Anna Meller
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Telemetry studies on terrestrial mammals have been carried out almost exclusively using neck collar-mounted devices. However, collars are not suitable for all species and all age classes and may therefore compromise animal welfare and data quality requirements. Here, we evaluate the use of non-collar tracking devices on wild boars ( Sus scrofa ), a species for which collars may be problematic due to neck shape and seasonal body mass variation. We tested pelt-glued tags and three types of GPS ear tags. In addition, animals were marked with plain cattle ear tags. Results The tested GPS tags exhibited various technical challenges related mostly to satellite coverage of the study area and tag loss. However, GPS devices enabled moderate movement monitoring of weeks to months, whereas plain cattle ear tags offered information on displacement over longer time intervals. The longest direct dispersal distance (163 km) by a wild boar sounder was discovered by cattle tags. Conclusions Data volume and quality obtained from small tags are inferior to data provided by GPS collars, but low-fix rate tags may enable monitoring of individuals with reduced invasiveness. Moreover, these tags enable tracking in cases where the collar is not an option. The low price and small size of the devices together with technical developments may offer cost-effective tools for future studies on dispersal and survival.

Animal BiotelemetryVol. 12(1)
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto, Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.