Alfalfa potassium and phosphorus uptake and use efficiencies as impacted by irrigation technology, deficit irrigation, and alfalfa cultivar

Abstract As competition for limited water resources in the western United States and other arid and semiarid regions intensifies, there is a need to provide alfalfa ( Medicago sativa ) growers with knowledge of how water‐optimizing practices impact alfalfa nutrient use. The objective of this research was to evaluate how three water management strategies, and their interactions, influence alfalfa K and P concentration, uptake, uptake efficiency, and internal use efficiency. Alfalfa cultivars, deficit irrigation, and irrigation technologies were tested at two sites in Utah during 2020–2021. A single drought‐tolerant (DT) cultivar (‘Ladak II’) was compared to a conventional alfalfa cultivar specific to each location. Four irrigation rates (100%, uniform reductions of 25% and 50%, and a targeted reduction of ∼50%) were nested within five pivot irrigation technologies. Few alfalfa K and P nutrient dynamics responded to the interactions of cultivar and rate or technology. Nutrient responses to the irrigation technologies were strongly associated with the technology effect on alfalfa yield such that uptake efficiency was sometimes greater with low‐elevation sprinkler technologies. The K and P responses to deficit irrigation were most pronounced at the uniform or targeted 50% irrigation rate. Alfalfa cultivar had the least impact on alfalfa K and P dynamics, and the DT cultivar never improved uptake or efficiencies. These results indicate that few adjustments in K and P management may be needed with the three water optimization approaches evaluated in this study. The most notable is that K and P fertilizer input can likely be reduced with severe deficit irrigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy Journal
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21692
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alfalfa potassium and phosphorus uptake and use efficiencies as impacted by irrigation technology, deficit irrigation, and alfalfa cultivar

Grant Cardon, Dakota Boren, Bradley Crookston, Matt Yost et al.
2 citations
Agronomy Journal
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
0.50
article

Alfalfa potassium and phosphorus uptake and use efficiencies as impacted by irrigation technology, deficit irrigation, and alfalfa cultivar

Grant Cardon, Dakota Boren, Bradley Crookston, Matt Yost, Tina Sullivan, Joseph Earl Creech
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract As competition for limited water resources in the western United States and other arid and semiarid regions intensifies, there is a need to provide alfalfa ( Medicago sativa ) growers with knowledge of how water‐optimizing practices impact alfalfa nutrient use. The objective of this research was to evaluate how three water management strategies, and their interactions, influence alfalfa K and P concentration, uptake, uptake efficiency, and internal use efficiency. Alfalfa cultivars, deficit irrigation, and irrigation technologies were tested at two sites in Utah during 2020–2021. A single drought‐tolerant (DT) cultivar (‘Ladak II’) was compared to a conventional alfalfa cultivar specific to each location. Four irrigation rates (100%, uniform reductions of 25% and 50%, and a targeted reduction of ∼50%) were nested within five pivot irrigation technologies. Few alfalfa K and P nutrient dynamics responded to the interactions of cultivar and rate or technology. Nutrient responses to the irrigation technologies were strongly associated with the technology effect on alfalfa yield such that uptake efficiency was sometimes greater with low‐elevation sprinkler technologies. The K and P responses to deficit irrigation were most pronounced at the uniform or targeted 50% irrigation rate. Alfalfa cultivar had the least impact on alfalfa K and P dynamics, and the DT cultivar never improved uptake or efficiencies. These results indicate that few adjustments in K and P management may be needed with the three water optimization approaches evaluated in this study. The most notable is that K and P fertilizer input can likely be reduced with severe deficit irrigation.

Agronomy JournalVol. 116(6)
Utah State University (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.