Parametric multi-level modeling of Lean Six Sigma

Abstract Lean Six Sigma is a methodology that combines Lean manufacturing and Six Sigma into a single framework for process improvement. This combination merges their tools and techniques to overcome their deficiencies while achieving bottom-line improvement. However, existing literature emphasizes general LSS implementation with very little work on modeling the interaction between Leanness and Six Sigma. This work developed a multi-level model containing leanness and Six Sigma levels to generalize LSS implementation. Three hierarchical levels—Six Sigma (level 3), leanness (level 2), and a fattening level (level 1—Sigma quality level) are defined for two models (parametrized and non-parametrized). Aggregate measures (process efficiency, asset intensity, production time, etc.) are considered at levels 2 and 3 to achieve the desired optimization goal at that level. For testing, three process measures [asset intensity (AI), planned stoppages (PS), wastes and rework (WR)] from the manufacturing data of a global brand spanning 18 months were analyzed. The maximum log-likelihood method was used to estimate the model parameters and they converged to 85.2%, 11.2%, and 8.87% for AI, PS, and WR respectively, with a strong correlation between AI and PS. A metaheuristic algorithm was extended to solve both models. The obtained process yield (0.111111 and 0.4132471), defects per million opportunities (DPMO) (12,426 and 18,046), and sigma level (3.6 and 3.74) for the parametrized and non-parametrized models respectively indicated optimal model performance and a need for the strategic use of LSS tools in improving the production output. Also, further reduction in wastes, stoppages, and downtime was observed upon tuning the parametric variables. This model provides a mathematical approach to analyzing LSS implementation and provides a basis for future adaptation to any organization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-024-00528-1
Primary Topic
Quality and Supply Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parametric multi-level modeling of Lean Six Sigma

Olumide F. Odeyinka, Oluwafemi Ipinnimo, Folorunso Ogunwolu
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Quality and Supply Management
article

Parametric multi-level modeling of Lean Six Sigma

Olumide F. Odeyinka, Oluwafemi Ipinnimo, Folorunso Ogunwolu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Lean Six Sigma is a methodology that combines Lean manufacturing and Six Sigma into a single framework for process improvement. This combination merges their tools and techniques to overcome their deficiencies while achieving bottom-line improvement. However, existing literature emphasizes general LSS implementation with very little work on modeling the interaction between Leanness and Six Sigma. This work developed a multi-level model containing leanness and Six Sigma levels to generalize LSS implementation. Three hierarchical levels—Six Sigma (level 3), leanness (level 2), and a fattening level (level 1—Sigma quality level) are defined for two models (parametrized and non-parametrized). Aggregate measures (process efficiency, asset intensity, production time, etc.) are considered at levels 2 and 3 to achieve the desired optimization goal at that level. For testing, three process measures [asset intensity (AI), planned stoppages (PS), wastes and rework (WR)] from the manufacturing data of a global brand spanning 18 months were analyzed. The maximum log-likelihood method was used to estimate the model parameters and they converged to 85.2%, 11.2%, and 8.87% for AI, PS, and WR respectively, with a strong correlation between AI and PS. A metaheuristic algorithm was extended to solve both models. The obtained process yield (0.111111 and 0.4132471), defects per million opportunities (DPMO) (12,426 and 18,046), and sigma level (3.6 and 3.74) for the parametrized and non-parametrized models respectively indicated optimal model performance and a need for the strategic use of LSS tools in improving the production output. Also, further reduction in wastes, stoppages, and downtime was observed upon tuning the parametric variables. This model provides a mathematical approach to analyzing LSS implementation and provides a basis for future adaptation to any organization.

Journal of Engineering and Applied ScienceVol. 71(1)
University of Lagos (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Quality and Supply Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.