A culture of digital planning? An international comparison of culture, planning and technology

Urban planning has become an increasingly digital practice in the last three decades and was accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Discussions around the digitization of planning processes have focused on the platforms planners use, and the barriers to their use. Such literature does not adequately explain the variability in the use of planning-specific technologies among planning authorities with the same resources and time. We explore the degree to which workplace and professional culture influence the use of digital technologies in planning practice in Australia, Great Britain, and the United States of America. To study cultural attitudes, a mixture of interview data from 29 planners and document analysis from professional organizations were used. The study found cultural factors play a role in determining the diffusion of technology in planning practice. Our analysis demonstrates points of convergence and divergence across all three geographies of practice, with stark differences in the way that technology is discussed and espoused, as well as a broader lack of clear principles to guide the profession through digital transitions across scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Planning Studies
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2024.2407166
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A culture of digital planning? An international comparison of culture, planning and technology

Dan Milz, Ruth Potts
4 citations
International Planning Studies
Smart Cities and Technologies
1.28
article

A culture of digital planning? An international comparison of culture, planning and technology

Dan Milz, Ruth Potts
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Urban planning has become an increasingly digital practice in the last three decades and was accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Discussions around the digitization of planning processes have focused on the platforms planners use, and the barriers to their use. Such literature does not adequately explain the variability in the use of planning-specific technologies among planning authorities with the same resources and time. We explore the degree to which workplace and professional culture influence the use of digital technologies in planning practice in Australia, Great Britain, and the United States of America. To study cultural attitudes, a mixture of interview data from 29 planners and document analysis from professional organizations were used. The study found cultural factors play a role in determining the diffusion of technology in planning practice. Our analysis demonstrates points of convergence and divergence across all three geographies of practice, with stark differences in the way that technology is discussed and espoused, as well as a broader lack of clear principles to guide the profession through digital transitions across scales.

International Planning StudiesVol. 29(4)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), University of Hawaii System (US), Cardiff University (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Smart Cities and Technologies
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A culture of digital planning? An international comparison of culture, planning and technology — Dan Milz, Ruth Potts · International Planning Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS