Molecular Biomarkers for In Vitro Thrombogenicity Assessment of Medical Device Materials

To develop standardized in vitro thrombogenicity test methods for evaluating medical device materials, three platelet activation biomarkers, beta-thromboglobulin (β-TG), platelet factor 4 (PF4), soluble p-selectin (CD62P), and a plasma coagulation marker, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), were investigated. Whole blood, drawn from six healthy human volunteers into Anticoagulant Citrate Dextrose Solution A was recalcified and heparinized over a concentration range of 0.5-1.5 U/mL. The blood was incubated with test materials with different thrombogenic potentials for 60 min at 37°C, using a 6 cm<sup>2</sup>/mL material surface area to blood volume ratio. After incubation, the blood platelet count was measured before centrifuging the blood to prepare platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and platelet-free plasma (PFP) for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis of the biomarkers. The results show that all four markers effectively differentiated the materials with different thrombogenic potentials at heparin concentrations from 1.0 to 1.5 U/mL. When a donor-specific heparin concentration (determined by activated clotting time) was used, the markers were able to differentiate materials consistently for blood from all the donors. Additionally, using PFP instead of PPP further improved the test method's ability to differentiate the thrombogenic materials from the negative control for β-TG and TAT. Moreover, the platelet activation markers were able to detect reversible platelet activation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP). In summary, all three platelet activation markers (β-TG, PF4, and CD62P) can distinguish thrombogenic potentials of different materials and detect ADP-induced reversible platelet activation. Test consistency and sensitivity can be enhanced by using a donor-specific heparin concentration and PFP. The same test conditions are applicable to the measurement of coagulation marker TAT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35491
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Platelet Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Molecular Biomarkers for In Vitro Thrombogenicity Assessment of Medical Device Materials

Qijin Lu, Richard A. Malinauskas, Mehulkumar Patel, Keerthana Srinivasan et al.
5 citations
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials
Platelet Disorders and Treatments
2.27
article

Molecular Biomarkers for In Vitro Thrombogenicity Assessment of Medical Device Materials

Qijin Lu, Richard A. Malinauskas, Mehulkumar Patel, Keerthana Srinivasan, Megan A. Jamiolkowski, Anna Parrish, Carlos J. Serna
article en
5 citations

Abstract

To develop standardized in vitro thrombogenicity test methods for evaluating medical device materials, three platelet activation biomarkers, beta-thromboglobulin (β-TG), platelet factor 4 (PF4), soluble p-selectin (CD62P), and a plasma coagulation marker, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), were investigated. Whole blood, drawn from six healthy human volunteers into Anticoagulant Citrate Dextrose Solution A was recalcified and heparinized over a concentration range of 0.5-1.5 U/mL. The blood was incubated with test materials with different thrombogenic potentials for 60 min at 37°C, using a 6 cm<sup>2</sup>/mL material surface area to blood volume ratio. After incubation, the blood platelet count was measured before centrifuging the blood to prepare platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and platelet-free plasma (PFP) for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis of the biomarkers. The results show that all four markers effectively differentiated the materials with different thrombogenic potentials at heparin concentrations from 1.0 to 1.5 U/mL. When a donor-specific heparin concentration (determined by activated clotting time) was used, the markers were able to differentiate materials consistently for blood from all the donors. Additionally, using PFP instead of PPP further improved the test method's ability to differentiate the thrombogenic materials from the negative control for β-TG and TAT. Moreover, the platelet activation markers were able to detect reversible platelet activation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP). In summary, all three platelet activation markers (β-TG, PF4, and CD62P) can distinguish thrombogenic potentials of different materials and detect ADP-induced reversible platelet activation. Test consistency and sensitivity can be enhanced by using a donor-specific heparin concentration and PFP. The same test conditions are applicable to the measurement of coagulation marker TAT.

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied BiomaterialsVol. 112(10)
United States Food and Drug Administration (US), Center for Devices and Radiological Health (US), Office of Science (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Platelet Disorders and Treatments
2.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.