The April 2023 SYM‐H = −233 nT Geomagnetic Storm: A Classical Event

Abstract The 23–24 April 2023 double‐peak (SYM‐H intensities of −179 and −233 nT) intense geomagnetic storm was caused by interplanetary magnetic field southward component B s associated with an interplanetary fast‐forward shock‐preceded sheath ( B s of 25 nT), followed by a magnetic cloud (MC) ( B s of 33 nT), respectively. These interplanetary structures were led by a coronal mass ejection erupted from the Sun in association with an M1.7 X‐ray flare. At the center of the MC, the plasma density exhibited an order of magnitude decrease, leading to a sub‐Alfvénic solar wind interval for ∼2.1 hr. Ionospheric Joule heating accounted for a significant part (∼81%) of the magnetospheric energy dissipation during the storm main phase. Equal amount of Joule heating in the dayside and nightside ionosphere is consistent with the observed intense and global‐scale DP2 (disturbance polar) currents during the storm main phase. The sub‐Alfvénic solar wind is associated with disappearance of substorms, a sharp decrease in Joule heating dissipation, and reduction in electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave amplitude. The shock/sheath compression of the magnetosphere led to relativistic electron flux losses in the outer radiation belt between L * = 3.5 and 5.5. Relativistic electron flux enhancements were detected in the lower L * ≤ 3.5 region during the storm main and recovery phases. Equatorial ionospheric plasma anomaly structures are found to be modulated by the prompt penetration electric fields. Around the anomaly crests, plasma density at ∼470 km altitude and altitude‐integrated ionospheric total electron content are found to increase by ∼60% and ∼80%, with ∼33% and ∼67% increases in their latitudinal extents compared to their quiet‐time values, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja032986
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The April 2023 SYM‐H = −233 nT Geomagnetic Storm: A Classical Event

R. B. Horne, Rongsheng Wang, Pierre Henri, G. S. Lakhina et al.
19 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
6.30
article

The April 2023 SYM‐H = −233 nT Geomagnetic Storm: A Classical Event

R. B. Horne, Rongsheng Wang, Pierre Henri, G. S. Lakhina, Rajkumar Hajra, San Lu, Aimin Du, Quanming Lu, B. T. Tsurutani, Xingliang Gao, Yang Xu
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Abstract The 23–24 April 2023 double‐peak (SYM‐H intensities of −179 and −233 nT) intense geomagnetic storm was caused by interplanetary magnetic field southward component B s associated with an interplanetary fast‐forward shock‐preceded sheath ( B s of 25 nT), followed by a magnetic cloud (MC) ( B s of 33 nT), respectively. These interplanetary structures were led by a coronal mass ejection erupted from the Sun in association with an M1.7 X‐ray flare. At the center of the MC, the plasma density exhibited an order of magnitude decrease, leading to a sub‐Alfvénic solar wind interval for ∼2.1 hr. Ionospheric Joule heating accounted for a significant part (∼81%) of the magnetospheric energy dissipation during the storm main phase. Equal amount of Joule heating in the dayside and nightside ionosphere is consistent with the observed intense and global‐scale DP2 (disturbance polar) currents during the storm main phase. The sub‐Alfvénic solar wind is associated with disappearance of substorms, a sharp decrease in Joule heating dissipation, and reduction in electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave amplitude. The shock/sheath compression of the magnetosphere led to relativistic electron flux losses in the outer radiation belt between L * = 3.5 and 5.5. Relativistic electron flux enhancements were detected in the lower L * ≤ 3.5 region during the storm main and recovery phases. Equatorial ionospheric plasma anomaly structures are found to be modulated by the prompt penetration electric fields. Around the anomaly crests, plasma density at ∼470 km altitude and altitude‐integrated ionospheric total electron content are found to increase by ∼60% and ∼80%, with ∼33% and ∼67% increases in their latitudinal extents compared to their quiet‐time values, respectively.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 129(10)
Université d'Orléans (FR), University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), British Antarctic Survey (GB), National University of Defense Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Université Côte d'Azur (FR), Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science (CN), Institute of Geology and Geophysics (CN), Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (FR), Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie de l’Environnement et de l’Espace (FR)
Sight Research UK, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
6.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.