Skill, Will, and Time: A Feasibility and Pilot Efficacy Study of Two Structured Interventions to Enhance Undergraduates’ Resilience Through Self-Regulation

The current study had two purposes: (1) to examine the feasibility and acceptability of two manualized intervention programs to enhance resilience through the mechanism of self-regulation in undergraduate students enrolled in Introductory Psychology, and (2) to examine preliminary efficacy of those interventions. Eligible participants were 445 undergraduates aged 18–25 years at a mid-size Canadian university during spring 2020, quasi-randomized to one of two 4-week self-regulation interventions taught via labs, focused on either “top-down” or “bottom-up” aspects of self-regulation, respectively. A total of N = 445 students provided data in the study, with 133 participants in interventions and 312 in the control group. Qualitative data indicated that the interventions were feasible and acceptable. Self-report measures of attention control, resilience, affect, and interoception, as well as exam scores, indicate dissociable effects for the two intervention conditions. As student mental health becomes an increasing concern, enhancing students’ well-being through primary prevention may prove to be a vital intervention focus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emerging Adulthood
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968241289630
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Skill, Will, and Time: A Feasibility and Pilot Efficacy Study of Two Structured Interventions to Enhance Undergraduates’ Resilience Through Self-Regulation

Louise Chim, Colette M. Smart, Patrick Nicoll, Jeremy Viczko et al.
Emerging Adulthood
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Skill, Will, and Time: A Feasibility and Pilot Efficacy Study of Two Structured Interventions to Enhance Undergraduates’ Resilience Through Self-Regulation

Louise Chim, Colette M. Smart, Patrick Nicoll, Jeremy Viczko, Lauren K. Qualls
article en

Abstract

The current study had two purposes: (1) to examine the feasibility and acceptability of two manualized intervention programs to enhance resilience through the mechanism of self-regulation in undergraduate students enrolled in Introductory Psychology, and (2) to examine preliminary efficacy of those interventions. Eligible participants were 445 undergraduates aged 18–25 years at a mid-size Canadian university during spring 2020, quasi-randomized to one of two 4-week self-regulation interventions taught via labs, focused on either “top-down” or “bottom-up” aspects of self-regulation, respectively. A total of N = 445 students provided data in the study, with 133 participants in interventions and 312 in the control group. Qualitative data indicated that the interventions were feasible and acceptable. Self-report measures of attention control, resilience, affect, and interoception, as well as exam scores, indicate dissociable effects for the two intervention conditions. As student mental health becomes an increasing concern, enhancing students’ well-being through primary prevention may prove to be a vital intervention focus.

Emerging AdulthoodVol. 13(1)
University of Victoria (CA)
University of Victoria
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.