Outcomes Following Staged Bilateral Total Knee Replacements: The Influence of First-Side Surgery on Results of the Second Side

Background In the UK, the vast majority of bilateral total knee replacements (BTKRs) are performed as staged procedures. Historically, the second-operated knee, in patients undergoing staged BTKRs, has poorer outcomes compared with the first-operated knee. The aim was to review patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for staged BTKRs. To further assess if outcomes from the first side of surgery can predict results on the second side. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on a consecutive cohort of staged BTKRs using the same approach and technique from August 2009 to January 2020. PROMs were recorded by means of Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) preoperatively, at six weeks postoperatively, and at one year. The minimal important change (MIC) in PROMs was set at ≥5. Results A total of 186 consecutive staged BTKRs were carried out in 93 patients. The average interval between surgeries was 28 months, ranging from 3 to 100 months. The mean age was 65.3 years for the first side and 67.7 years for the second side, with 58.1% of the patients (54/93) being female. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 35.1 for the first side and increased to 35.8 for the second side (p=0.503). One-year follow-up PROMs were available for 97.8% of the first-side surgeries and 89.2% of the second-side surgeries. The average improvement in PROMs at one year was 18.3 for the first side and 15.8 for the second side (p=0.108). A total of 95.6% of patients achieved the MIC for the first side, while 87.9% achieved it for the second side (p=0.340). Fourteen TKRs performed in 13 patients did not achieve MIC at one year. Among these 13 patients, three (23.1%) did not reach MIC after the first-side surgery, compared to nine (61.5%) after the second-side surgery. One patient did not achieve MIC for either side. Of the 14 TKRs that failed to reach MIC in one year, 10 eventually met MIC in two years. The four TKRs that did not achieve MIC at two years were performed on females with high BMIs. Conclusion This study found no significant difference in PROMs improvements between the first and second sides of staged BTKRs at one-year follow-up. A failure to reach the MIC on one side does not affect the success of the other side. Most patients who do not achieve MIC in one year are likely to reach it in two years. Persistent poor scores were associated with high BMI and female sex.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.70374
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes Following Staged Bilateral Total Knee Replacements: The Influence of First-Side Surgery on Results of the Second Side

Peter L. Lewis, Ullas Jayaraju, Rishi Trivedi, Joseph Boktor et al.
Cureus
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Outcomes Following Staged Bilateral Total Knee Replacements: The Influence of First-Side Surgery on Results of the Second Side

Peter L. Lewis, Ullas Jayaraju, Rishi Trivedi, Joseph Boktor, Vinay Mathew Joseph, Awf Alshahwani, Kunal Ghosh Roy
article en

Abstract

Background In the UK, the vast majority of bilateral total knee replacements (BTKRs) are performed as staged procedures. Historically, the second-operated knee, in patients undergoing staged BTKRs, has poorer outcomes compared with the first-operated knee. The aim was to review patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for staged BTKRs. To further assess if outcomes from the first side of surgery can predict results on the second side. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on a consecutive cohort of staged BTKRs using the same approach and technique from August 2009 to January 2020. PROMs were recorded by means of Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) preoperatively, at six weeks postoperatively, and at one year. The minimal important change (MIC) in PROMs was set at ≥5. Results A total of 186 consecutive staged BTKRs were carried out in 93 patients. The average interval between surgeries was 28 months, ranging from 3 to 100 months. The mean age was 65.3 years for the first side and 67.7 years for the second side, with 58.1% of the patients (54/93) being female. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 35.1 for the first side and increased to 35.8 for the second side (p=0.503). One-year follow-up PROMs were available for 97.8% of the first-side surgeries and 89.2% of the second-side surgeries. The average improvement in PROMs at one year was 18.3 for the first side and 15.8 for the second side (p=0.108). A total of 95.6% of patients achieved the MIC for the first side, while 87.9% achieved it for the second side (p=0.340). Fourteen TKRs performed in 13 patients did not achieve MIC at one year. Among these 13 patients, three (23.1%) did not reach MIC after the first-side surgery, compared to nine (61.5%) after the second-side surgery. One patient did not achieve MIC for either side. Of the 14 TKRs that failed to reach MIC in one year, 10 eventually met MIC in two years. The four TKRs that did not achieve MIC at two years were performed on females with high BMIs. Conclusion This study found no significant difference in PROMs improvements between the first and second sides of staged BTKRs at one-year follow-up. A failure to reach the MIC on one side does not affect the success of the other side. Most patients who do not achieve MIC in one year are likely to reach it in two years. Persistent poor scores were associated with high BMI and female sex.

CureusVol. 16(9)
Leicester Royal Infirmary (GB), Leicester General Hospital (GB), University Hospital of Wales (GB), Royal Glamorgan Hospital (GB), Glangwili General Hospital (GB), Cwm Taf University Health Board (GB), University Dental Hospital on Cardiff University (GB), Prince Charles Hospital (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.