Legitimacy, voice and power in ride hailing labour movements in Kenya

Abstract One way to improve gig work may be to strengthen worker voice via worker organisations. But organising gig workers under economic strain is difficult. In this article, I apply the power resources approach to two related but divergent cases of digital driver mobilisation—Mombasa and Nairobi—to demonstrate the relationship between the cultivation of internal and external legitimacy and the implications each has for different types of power. In Mombasa, association leaders mobilised a majority of local drivers and built internal legitimacy through geographic zone groups, direct communications and democratic norms. This legitimacy enabled them to use structural power, taking direct action against app companies. Unable to build internal legitimacy, Nairobi association leaders instead cultivated external legitimacy through media and politician appeals, using political power to press for regulation. However, workers contested representation by these leaders, raising questions about whether relying solely on external legitimacy increases effective worker voice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Technology Work and Employment
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12307
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legitimacy, voice and power in ride hailing labour movements in Kenya

Julie Zollmann
1 citations
New Technology Work and Employment
Labor Movements and Unions
0.86
article

Legitimacy, voice and power in ride hailing labour movements in Kenya

Julie Zollmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract One way to improve gig work may be to strengthen worker voice via worker organisations. But organising gig workers under economic strain is difficult. In this article, I apply the power resources approach to two related but divergent cases of digital driver mobilisation—Mombasa and Nairobi—to demonstrate the relationship between the cultivation of internal and external legitimacy and the implications each has for different types of power. In Mombasa, association leaders mobilised a majority of local drivers and built internal legitimacy through geographic zone groups, direct communications and democratic norms. This legitimacy enabled them to use structural power, taking direct action against app companies. Unable to build internal legitimacy, Nairobi association leaders instead cultivated external legitimacy through media and politician appeals, using political power to press for regulation. However, workers contested representation by these leaders, raising questions about whether relying solely on external legitimacy increases effective worker voice.

New Technology Work and EmploymentVol. 40(2)
Tufts University (US)
Mastercard Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Labor Movements and Unions
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legitimacy, voice and power in ride hailing labour movements in Kenya — Julie Zollmann · New Technology Work and Employment (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS