Winds of change? Neoclassical realism, foreign policy change, and European responses to the Russia-Ukraine War

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 brought about diplomatic condemnation across Europe and military support for Kyiv amid an uptick in European collective identity. Yet national responses differed significantly in terms of their contribution, their consistency, the degree of underlying contestation, their willingness to lead, and their choice of institutional frameworks. Explaining this variation requires an understanding of the interaction between systemic forces and a host of unit-level attributes, including military capabilities and geopolitical position, ideas and identities, and domestic politics. This introductory article examines each of these factors with a view to explaining the underlying variation in European responses, engaging with theoretical insights from Neoclassical Realism and Foreign Policy Analysis. Drawing on examples from the Special Section, we show how the divergent responses of several European countries – France, the United Kingdom, Poland, Germany, Estonia, and Sweden – can be explained by reference to these three categories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481241280170
Citations
21
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
46.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Winds of change? Neoclassical realism, foreign policy change, and European responses to the Russia-Ukraine War

Benjamin Martill, Monika Sus
21 citations
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
International Relations and Foreign Policy
46.85
article

Winds of change? Neoclassical realism, foreign policy change, and European responses to the Russia-Ukraine War

Benjamin Martill, Monika Sus
article en
21 citations

Abstract

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 brought about diplomatic condemnation across Europe and military support for Kyiv amid an uptick in European collective identity. Yet national responses differed significantly in terms of their contribution, their consistency, the degree of underlying contestation, their willingness to lead, and their choice of institutional frameworks. Explaining this variation requires an understanding of the interaction between systemic forces and a host of unit-level attributes, including military capabilities and geopolitical position, ideas and identities, and domestic politics. This introductory article examines each of these factors with a view to explaining the underlying variation in European responses, engaging with theoretical insights from Neoclassical Realism and Foreign Policy Analysis. Drawing on examples from the Special Section, we show how the divergent responses of several European countries – France, the United Kingdom, Poland, Germany, Estonia, and Sweden – can be explained by reference to these three categories.

The British Journal of Politics and International RelationsVol. 27(4)
Hertie School (DE), Institute of Political Studies (PL), University of Edinburgh (GB), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
46.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.