From informal farmland rental to market‐oriented transactions: Do China's Land Transfer Service Centers help?

Abstract Farmland rental markets are important in production agriculture. Informal farmland rental markets have taken root in Chinese agriculture. However, farmland rental markets need to be transparent for increased efficiency and smooth functioning. This study uses three waves of nationally representative panel data and a difference‐in‐differences framework to examine the effect of China's Land Transfer Service Centers (LTSCs) on market‐oriented farmland transfers. The result indicates that LTSCs enhance farmland transfer marketisation, encouraging landowners to rent their land to large‐scale operators, engage in fixed‐term contracts and charge pecuniary rents. However, the LTSCs' “discrimination” against smallholders may limit their impact on the overall market. Additionally, LTSCs have weaker effects in villages with large clans and stronger effects in villages with bank outlets. The results illustrate the potential value of intermediary service organisations (ISOs) in land rental markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12615
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From informal farmland rental to market‐oriented transactions: Do China's Land Transfer Service Centers help?

Ashok K. Mishra, Pengfei Fan, Min Su, Shuyi Feng
9 citations
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Land Rights and Reforms
3.00
article

From informal farmland rental to market‐oriented transactions: Do China's Land Transfer Service Centers help?

Ashok K. Mishra, Pengfei Fan, Min Su, Shuyi Feng
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Farmland rental markets are important in production agriculture. Informal farmland rental markets have taken root in Chinese agriculture. However, farmland rental markets need to be transparent for increased efficiency and smooth functioning. This study uses three waves of nationally representative panel data and a difference‐in‐differences framework to examine the effect of China's Land Transfer Service Centers (LTSCs) on market‐oriented farmland transfers. The result indicates that LTSCs enhance farmland transfer marketisation, encouraging landowners to rent their land to large‐scale operators, engage in fixed‐term contracts and charge pecuniary rents. However, the LTSCs' “discrimination” against smallholders may limit their impact on the overall market. Additionally, LTSCs have weaker effects in villages with large clans and stronger effects in villages with bank outlets. The results illustrate the potential value of intermediary service organisations (ISOs) in land rental markets.

Journal of Agricultural EconomicsVol. 76(1)
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), China Resources (China) (CN), Arizona State University (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Land Rights and Reforms
3.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From informal farmland rental to market‐oriented transactions: Do China's Land Transfer Service Centers help? — Ashok K. Mishra, Pengfei Fan, et al. · Journal of Agricultural Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS