Machine Learning Modeling for Predicting Tensile Strain Capacity of Pipelines and Identifying Key Factors

Abstract Machine learning (ML) techniques have recently gained great attention across a multitude of engineering domains, including pipeline materials. However, their application to tensile strain capacity (TSC) modeling remains unexplored. To bridge this gap, this study developed and evaluated an ML model to predict the tensile strain capacity of girth-welded pipelines. The model was trained on over 20,000 data points derived from a TSC equation available in the literature. The ML model demonstrated robust performance in predicting tensile strain capacities. Evidence of this lies in the near-zero means, minimal standard deviations, and normal distribution of residuals for both the training and test datasets. These collectively suggest that the model provides a good fit for the data. Furthermore, the model's loss behavior indicates successful convergence and generalization, without signs of overfitting or underfitting. An analysis using the random forest method revealed that the geometry of the flaw, specifically the flaw depth, is the most influential variable in predicting the TSC. This could be attributed to its significant impact on the fracture toughness of materials. In contrast, material properties and fracture toughness exert less influence relatively, despite their contributions to the model. This finding underscores the importance of flaw geometry in TSC prediction models. Overall, the development of a data-driven TSC model has shown efficient TSC modeling. This model leverages ML techniques, allowing for continuous updates with new data via deep learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4066675
Primary Topic
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Modeling for Predicting Tensile Strain Capacity of Pipelines and Identifying Key Factors

Dong-Yeob Park
Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
article

Machine Learning Modeling for Predicting Tensile Strain Capacity of Pipelines and Identifying Key Factors

Dong-Yeob Park
article en

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning (ML) techniques have recently gained great attention across a multitude of engineering domains, including pipeline materials. However, their application to tensile strain capacity (TSC) modeling remains unexplored. To bridge this gap, this study developed and evaluated an ML model to predict the tensile strain capacity of girth-welded pipelines. The model was trained on over 20,000 data points derived from a TSC equation available in the literature. The ML model demonstrated robust performance in predicting tensile strain capacities. Evidence of this lies in the near-zero means, minimal standard deviations, and normal distribution of residuals for both the training and test datasets. These collectively suggest that the model provides a good fit for the data. Furthermore, the model's loss behavior indicates successful convergence and generalization, without signs of overfitting or underfitting. An analysis using the random forest method revealed that the geometry of the flaw, specifically the flaw depth, is the most influential variable in predicting the TSC. This could be attributed to its significant impact on the fracture toughness of materials. In contrast, material properties and fracture toughness exert less influence relatively, despite their contributions to the model. This finding underscores the importance of flaw geometry in TSC prediction models. Overall, the development of a data-driven TSC model has shown efficient TSC modeling. This model leverages ML techniques, allowing for continuous updates with new data via deep learning.

Journal of Pressure Vessel TechnologyVol. 146(6)
Natural Resources Canada (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.