Impact of risk information on health beliefs and behaviours: experimental evidence

The local prevalence of infections and the severity of their consequences are among the key determinants of the adoption of preventive behaviours against infectious diseases. In Bangladesh, where local COVID-19 infection statistics were not readily accessible, I found that most people underestimated the local prevalence of COVID-19 infections while overestimated the fatality rate. In a randomized experiment, the treatment group was provided with information about the coronavirus case numbers in their districts, along with the case fatality rate in Bangladesh and globally. Immediately after receiving this information, the treatment group perceived a higher infection risk. Nine to fifteen days post-intervention, those who received information were less likely to underestimate the local prevalence and, consequently, still perceived a higher infection risk. They also updated their belief about the fatality rate downward. Potentially due to this countervailing update of risk beliefs, the information had no effect on self-reported preventive behaviours.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economics
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2405204
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of risk information on health beliefs and behaviours: experimental evidence

Ferdous Zaman Sardar
Applied Economics
Behavioral Health and Interventions
article

Impact of risk information on health beliefs and behaviours: experimental evidence

Ferdous Zaman Sardar
article en

Abstract

The local prevalence of infections and the severity of their consequences are among the key determinants of the adoption of preventive behaviours against infectious diseases. In Bangladesh, where local COVID-19 infection statistics were not readily accessible, I found that most people underestimated the local prevalence of COVID-19 infections while overestimated the fatality rate. In a randomized experiment, the treatment group was provided with information about the coronavirus case numbers in their districts, along with the case fatality rate in Bangladesh and globally. Immediately after receiving this information, the treatment group perceived a higher infection risk. Nine to fifteen days post-intervention, those who received information were less likely to underestimate the local prevalence and, consequently, still perceived a higher infection risk. They also updated their belief about the fatality rate downward. Potentially due to this countervailing update of risk beliefs, the information had no effect on self-reported preventive behaviours.

Applied EconomicsVol. 57(53)
Bryant University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of risk information on health beliefs and behaviours: experimental evidence — Ferdous Zaman Sardar · Applied Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS