Nurses’ justifications for morally courageous acts in ethical conflicts: A narrative inquiry

<b>Background:</b> Moral courage is defined as the courage to act in ethical conflicts based on individual or professional values despite the personal risks involved. Nurses justify their decisions to act morally courageously as part of their ethical decision-making.<b>Objective:</b> To describe registered nurses' justifications for acting morally courageously, or not, in ethical conflicts where they needed moral courage.<b>Research design:</b> A narrative inquiry with a holistic content approach was used. Individual, in-depth interviews were conducted in January-February 2023. The data were analysed using holistic content analysis.<b>Participants and research context:</b> Fourteen registered nurses with experience in situations where they needed moral courage participated. The nurses came from the somatic, palliative, mental health, and substance abuse care fields in Finland.<b>Ethical considerations:</b> Good scientific practice was followed. Ethical approval was obtained before data collection from the university's ethics committee.<b>Findings:</b> The nurses needed moral courage in ethical conflicts with patients present and between professionals. Individual responsibility, professional ethics, and emotions were identified as bases of nurses' justifications for morally courageous acts. The justifications for acting morally courageously, or not, had individual, contextual, and organisational perspectives. Morally courageous acts included starting a discussion about the conflict with other professionals and reporting the situation in writing within one's organisation.<b>Discussion and conclusions:</b> The identified bases and perspectives of justifications illustrate the complexity of nurses' decision-making in ethical conflicts, either leading to morally courageous acts or not. These results can inform nursing practice and research in developing processes to strengthen nurses' moral courage and examining relationships between moral courage and other concepts, such as moral resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Ethics
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241284357
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nurses’ justifications for morally courageous acts in ethical conflicts: A narrative inquiry

Helena Leino‐Kilpi, Elina Pajakoski, Minna Stolt, Riitta Suhonen et al.
5 citations
Nursing Ethics
Ethics in medical practice
4.25
article

Nurses’ justifications for morally courageous acts in ethical conflicts: A narrative inquiry

Helena Leino‐Kilpi, Elina Pajakoski, Minna Stolt, Riitta Suhonen, Anto Čartolovni
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Moral courage is defined as the courage to act in ethical conflicts based on individual or professional values despite the personal risks involved. Nurses justify their decisions to act morally courageously as part of their ethical decision-making.<b>Objective:</b> To describe registered nurses' justifications for acting morally courageously, or not, in ethical conflicts where they needed moral courage.<b>Research design:</b> A narrative inquiry with a holistic content approach was used. Individual, in-depth interviews were conducted in January-February 2023. The data were analysed using holistic content analysis.<b>Participants and research context:</b> Fourteen registered nurses with experience in situations where they needed moral courage participated. The nurses came from the somatic, palliative, mental health, and substance abuse care fields in Finland.<b>Ethical considerations:</b> Good scientific practice was followed. Ethical approval was obtained before data collection from the university's ethics committee.<b>Findings:</b> The nurses needed moral courage in ethical conflicts with patients present and between professionals. Individual responsibility, professional ethics, and emotions were identified as bases of nurses' justifications for morally courageous acts. The justifications for acting morally courageously, or not, had individual, contextual, and organisational perspectives. Morally courageous acts included starting a discussion about the conflict with other professionals and reporting the situation in writing within one's organisation.<b>Discussion and conclusions:</b> The identified bases and perspectives of justifications illustrate the complexity of nurses' decision-making in ethical conflicts, either leading to morally courageous acts or not. These results can inform nursing practice and research in developing processes to strengthen nurses' moral courage and examining relationships between moral courage and other concepts, such as moral resilience.

Nursing EthicsVol. 32(3)
University of Turku (FI), Catholic University of Croatia (HR)
Emil Aaltosen Säätiö
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics in medical practice
4.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.