Risk assessment of goaf instability based on a variable weight model

Goaf instability poses significant hazards, affecting mine safety and public welfare. This study aims to evaluate the risk of goaf instability to enhance safety measures in mining operations. Thirteen key indicators were identified to construct a comprehensive evaluation index system. By integrating game theory, we combined subjective and objective weights to develop a constant weight model, which was subsequently improved by considering data distribution characteristics to develop a local variable weight model. The variable weight intervals were determined through cumulative frequency analysis of normalized factor indices, and the Monte Carlo method was employed to define weight adjustment parameters. Using the cloud model, we assessed the instability risk of goafs. Our results indicate that the variable weight model provides higher evaluation accuracy compared to the constant weight model, offering clearer and more distinguishable membership degrees for the evaluation outcomes, suggesting its potential for more precise risk assessments in mining operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Earth Science
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1469834
Primary Topic
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk assessment of goaf instability based on a variable weight model

Linning Guo, Kepeng Hou, Yong Yang, Huafen Sun
Frontiers in Earth Science
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
article

Risk assessment of goaf instability based on a variable weight model

Linning Guo, Kepeng Hou, Yong Yang, Huafen Sun
article en

Abstract

Goaf instability poses significant hazards, affecting mine safety and public welfare. This study aims to evaluate the risk of goaf instability to enhance safety measures in mining operations. Thirteen key indicators were identified to construct a comprehensive evaluation index system. By integrating game theory, we combined subjective and objective weights to develop a constant weight model, which was subsequently improved by considering data distribution characteristics to develop a local variable weight model. The variable weight intervals were determined through cumulative frequency analysis of normalized factor indices, and the Monte Carlo method was employed to define weight adjustment parameters. Using the cloud model, we assessed the instability risk of goafs. Our results indicate that the variable weight model provides higher evaluation accuracy compared to the constant weight model, offering clearer and more distinguishable membership degrees for the evaluation outcomes, suggesting its potential for more precise risk assessments in mining operations.

Frontiers in Earth ScienceVol. 12
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), Kunming University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Risk assessment of goaf instability based on a variable weight model — Linning Guo, Kepeng Hou, et al. · Frontiers in Earth Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS