How Does Your Identification System Measure Up? A Guide to Applying the CASA Criteria to Gifted and Talented Identification Systems

The ability to effectively identify students for advanced learning opportunities has been an ongoing issue within the field of gifted education. Common criteria to guide the design and evaluation of identification systems has been essentially non-existent. In this article we provide a practical guide for evaluating and reflecting on the effectiveness of identification criteria, namely: CASA (Cost, Alignment, Sensitivity, and Access). To demonstrate their use, the CASA criteria are described and the criteria are applied to a hypothetical district with discussion about decisions and changes to support more equitable identification and services alignment. A checklist is also provided to guide district leaders with applying the CASA criteria to their own identification systems. This article builds upon previous descriptions of CASA that have been published.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gifted Child Today
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175241263983
Primary Topic
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Does Your Identification System Measure Up? A Guide to Applying the CASA Criteria to Gifted and Talented Identification Systems

Tamra Stambaugh, Matthew C. Makel, Scott J. Peters, Lindsay Ellis Lee et al.
Gifted Child Today
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
article

How Does Your Identification System Measure Up? A Guide to Applying the CASA Criteria to Gifted and Talented Identification Systems

Tamra Stambaugh, Matthew C. Makel, Scott J. Peters, Lindsay Ellis Lee, Kiana R. Johnson
article en

Abstract

The ability to effectively identify students for advanced learning opportunities has been an ongoing issue within the field of gifted education. Common criteria to guide the design and evaluation of identification systems has been essentially non-existent. In this article we provide a practical guide for evaluating and reflecting on the effectiveness of identification criteria, namely: CASA (Cost, Alignment, Sensitivity, and Access). To demonstrate their use, the CASA criteria are described and the criteria are applied to a hypothetical district with discussion about decisions and changes to support more equitable identification and services alignment. A checklist is also provided to guide district leaders with applying the CASA criteria to their own identification systems. This article builds upon previous descriptions of CASA that have been published.

Gifted Child TodayVol. 47(4)
East Tennessee State University (US), Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (United States) (US), Whitworth University (US), University of Calgary (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.